Destony521

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kizawa Memorial Hospital (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kizawa Memorial Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Destony521, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 22:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kizawa Memorial Hospital (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kizawa Memorial Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 17:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2024

Your edit to Artificial kidney has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

All I added was some paraphrased text from our most relevant, recent paper which is published on the web in Nature, and a link to said article. This is science, not pop fiction. It is public domain knowledge that CKD patients and experts in the field have a right to know. By deleting valid edits you act in direct contradiction of Wikipedia's mission -- the sharing of knowledge. Please put it back the way I had it. Destony521 (talk) 01:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

UPDATE. Nevermind about putting it back the way I had it. I went ahead and rewrote it side step the copyright issue, and to be easier for a layperson and more descriptive. Since this is my original text, there is no copyright violation. Please do not delete my work. Destony521 (talk) 01:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry but we can't take your word for it that you are the copyright holder of the source paper. Thank you for taking the time to re-write the content. — Diannaa (talk) 11:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Your position is understandable and I appreciate your attention to IP protection. In retrospect rewriting resulted in a better article than simply paraphrasing. TLDR win-win & thanks. Destony521 (talk) 00:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)