This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Depressionhurts the Second (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

For goodness sake! I already told you that I created this account because my original account DepressionHurts was completely blocked and I couldn't even edit my talk page. Again, I am being wrongfully accused of sockpuppetry for User: YourBrain. I need this account so that I can actually communicate with Admins about this mistake that is going on with DepressionHurts.

Decline reason:

If your other account is blocked, and you have not recieved satisfactory response from the regular admins, your best recourse is to contact the arbitration committee. The instructions and email address for doing so is at WP:ARBCOM. ArbCom members have access to the checkuser tool, which regular admins do not, so they can investigate your claims while the rest of us admins cannot. Jayron32 02:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay... but User:DepressionHurts is obviously not a new user. If you aren't User:YourBrain, then what is the name of your other account or accounts? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are so many rumors going on. User: DepressionHurts was created mid-January (that does not seem "new" in my opinion). Then, somehow I got associated with User: YourBrain and User: DepressionHurts got completely blocked and I couldn't edit my user page AS A RESULT i created User:Depressionhurts the Second just so that I could communicate. Long story short, I have User: DepressionHurts and User:Depressionhurts the Second.----Depressionhurts the Second (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Depressionhurts the Second (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If possible, I would like User: FisherQueen to answer this. This block is not justified and it is obvious because FisherQueen and many others seem to think that I have more than one account (like I said I created this account because my other account became completely blocked and I couldn't even edit my talk page). My first account is being accused of sock puppetry with User: YourBrain. I have no association with YourBrain...only the one I am using now and my other blocked account. Please give me back my editing ability because I am innocent.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you requested an answer, I reply here. User:DepressionHurts never made a constructive edit to Wikipedia, and appears to exist solely to write about User:YourBrain. I reviewed the contribution history of User:DepressionHurts, and couldn't find any evidence that the user operating it was likely to make the encyclopedia better, or was interested in doing so. I do not know whether you are User:YourBrain, or a friend or enemy of hers, or some other user I haven't identified, but I cannot see any reason that you would need access to Wikipedia. You have yet to even express an interest in writing an encyclopedia, which is what we are working on here. And, according to the block log, User:DepressionHurts has not been blocked from talk page access. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

There's also this small detail: User:YourBrain has edited on three different IPs. Prior to the creation of this account, only one of those IPs was used both by YourBrain and DepressionHurts; the other two were used only by YourBrain. However, this account was created on one of the other IPs used by YourBrain. And you tell us there's no association between either of these accounts and YourBrain? That's pretty hard to believe. --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Well, its a large network. I don't know who else is using wikipedia. But, i am not aware of who is doing it. How do you administrators account for innocent people? You probably can't since you tend to assume that everyone is guilty. And no, I am not able to edit my talk page on DepressionHurts. Depressionhurts the Second (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Depressionhurts the Second (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok, listen very carefully. This is getting very annoying. I don't care how "hard it is to believe" Jpgordon, but i am innocent and it is really starting to get on my nerves Fisherqueen. I want my account back to its full capabilities because nothing here is justified and/or fair.

Decline reason:

No reason to allow this on-wiki puppet show to continue any longer. Get back in the drawer--and to make sure you stay there, this talk page is disabled. Blueboy96 23:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've just blocked another sock from here; and, like User:DepressionHurts, User:ThePianoPlayo immediately went to edit User talk:Beeblebrox. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply