User talk:Dengarde/Archive 1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Lbrun12415 in topic Long time no see(talk)

Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Dengarde, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --myselfalso 20:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Brawl edit

You dealeated a section I added on brawl why? -colin012 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin012 (talkcontribs) 14:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

IP Mishap edit

Me and B.Fire princess have a simmler IP addrass to. Anubiz 01:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hay edit

Thos are my Boxes! Anubiz 02:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hehe. Sorry. I have a habit of stealing coding I like. Want me to take them down? Dengarde 02:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC) I dont care, I just don't think you can do that. Anubiz 02:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Forum edit

I'll refer you to the big box that says "This is not a forum for general discussion of Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Any such messages will be deleted." All three comments refer to the correlation between characters and music, not the article. TTN 00:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your word is not law, TTN, you are not the almighty Wikipedia god. Furthermore, The talk pages were made for this exact purpose. If people have things to say, THEY MAY SAY IT. Two of the three comments were relevent to the conversation, therefore, they're allowed to stay. You seriously need to think about how you do things on Wikipedia. Dengarde 00:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
If I feel like posting why I believe that "x means King Dedede will or will not be in the game", I'm allowed to post it? My word isn't "law", but a policy sure is one. TTN 00:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes you are. It's posting information that is making a statement about why said info should not be in the article, hence improving it. What Zojo and OBEY STARMAN said were facts against Rigleys inclusion in the article. Completely relevant. And don't point the policy at me, I've read the whole thing. Dengarde 00:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Only the initial statement was relevant. The rest are just discussing why the music does or doesn't make the character, which is not contributing to the discussion. If you have read it, why are you arguing? TTN 00:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
By that logic, YOUR comment wasn't relevant either. How is demanding that no-one talk about it relevant to the article? It's not. It's like Borincano75 said. Pointing out a fact over a debate isn't against the rules either Dengarde 00:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
My comment was helping keep the talk page clear of clutter, which can only help us discuss over relevant topics easier. Those weren't to help the discussion; they were to further an unneeded discussion, which can only lead to pointless comments like DOOMtech's comment. They may have been posted to be helpful, but they just lead us down a road of forum discussions. Anyways, there is no point in continuing this. Just don't readd pointless comments. TTN 00:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Demanding people do do something isn't preventing clutter, it just adds more. I agree that DOOMtech's comment was stupid, but comments like that are inevitable. If a talk page gets to cluttered or big, do the logical thing: Archive it. Dengarde 00:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:AtlasMay.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AtlasMay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re5 edit

All right I see. There was a huge debate about using hidden messages on the StarCraft II; users originally placed them to remind users about the Wikipedia's editing policies. --ShadowJester07Talk 03:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

What is the reason? edit

  • Why can't the assist trophies be mentioned if they are a new feature in the game? and they are a new feature anyway, so y not? (Tigerghost 03:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC))Reply
    • Oh okay, thanks, i should have read the FAQs section anyways. I read it after my edits were reverted, lol. now i know. (Tigerghost 03:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC))Reply


Signature edit

Would you please make your signature easier to read and less of a distraction on talk pages by possibly changing the color of the box of the text color? See WP:SIG#Appearance and color041744 07:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE edit

Yes, thank you (:→041744 18:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Resident Evil 2 edit

Thanks! Should have thought of that... Geoff B 17:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

My User Talk Page edit

Forgive my rather odd edit summary. Shadowbot loves to miss 1 section every time it archives, as you can see here: [1]. I removed the skipped section and placed it here: [2]. -WarthogDemon 00:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Once again, sorry for the confusion. :) -WarthogDemon 00:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Oh no problem. I've made that same mistake too, and others have made the same mistake with me. :) Happy editing! -WarthogDemon 00:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Umbrella Chronicles edit

Yep, it's from the wallpaper from residentevil.com found by the fan site rehorror.net The isite hasn't been updated with them yet but they were found in their root directory also including some buddy icosn and a Jill and Wesker wallpapers. Here's the link to it: http://www.residentevil.com/assets/downloads/wallpapers/resevil_3_1024x768.jpg

CrushNush 18:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

LOL Yeah it's a bit dumb from them but at least we get new info before they release it hahaha - CrushNush 00:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cheats edit

Hey, I saw you reverted my edit on Resident Evil 4. Jst wanted to find out what I did wrong. I want to set up sections or links for Cheats for various games. Im new here so I dont lnow what I did wrong. Thanks --JasonHanson 23:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, fair enough. One more questin. I thought the external links section is to give links to articles that wouldnt normally be allowed in Wikiepdia, like Cheats fro example. So what exactly is external links for? Sorry Im new here not sure what goes where. --JasonHanson 00:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Super Smash Bros. Brawl edit

In reference to this edit, please try to avoid biting the newcomers. Thanks. Useight 23:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I was just about to complain about this revert, but I just checked the site and I see what you mean. When I read the article, I thought it meant that the phrases themselves were taunts, not that they were activated the same way as taunts. That being said, I'm going to revert your revert so people don't get the wrong idea. The world's hungriest paperweight 03:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

October 2007 edit

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Jmlk17 02:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE5 edit

"not the place" have a sense of humor...the whole convo was rediculous anyway...stop being a markScott Free 21:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply can be seen here. He removed it due to "Bullshit". How mature.

RE edit

"Woah, you're only 13? I thought you were SOOO much older then that" I try to emulate myself in a older light, nice to know It works ;). Atomic Religione 20:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Heh! Don't worry about it. I can't tell you how many times I've been beaten to the punch. It happens because great minds think alike, I suppose. You Can't See Me! 23:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Spam Blacklist edit

I tried searching for the domains of the links on my userpage in the black list, but I couldn't find them. Maybe I'm just missing them? Do you know which ones they are? Most of those domains are linked somewhere else on Wikipedia for their various articles (GameFAQs, Ambrosia Software, Photobucket, InvisionFree) and the other a Wikia Wiki. There's a couple of external links in the userboxes themselves, but I could not find those either. I feel like I'm missing something rather obvious here... TwilightPhoenix 00:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply can be seen here DengardeComplaints 00:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Took the one out. Not sure why an Invision Free board would be blacklisted, especially since the one I linked to has zero spam on it... Oh well, if it still doesn't work, then I don't know what's going on. Wouldn't be the first time Wikipedia has done some strange things. TwilightPhoenix 05:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen here. DengardeComplaints 17:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

SSBB edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. — Malcolm (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply can he seen Here. Also, LOL @ Mr. Bubbles, he came closer to violating it then I did :P DengardeComplaints 20:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Luigi edit

That "Guy" clearly works for Nintendo. It is also seems evident that he is one of the development team.

If this has been brought up before, then do not undo it, as others shall leave comments saying that. Taking it away seems like you don't want others to see it.

And it would be helpful if you could give me a link to where it was brought up.--Pluvia 06:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply can be seen here. DengardeComplaints 07:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the notice edit

about the Meta Knight image (and other video game images). I'll find an in-franchise one. BlueCanary9999 02:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply can be seen here. DengardeComplaints 01:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

On Personal Attack edit

Thanks for helping, but it was actually the other way around. I jokingly called Rrburke that whilst inebriated. :-p We've resolved the issue since. --ShadowJester07Talk 01:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply can be seen here. DengardeComplaints 01:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I'll heed the advice ;-) --ShadowJester07Talk 01:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why do you say that David Hayter is not a 100% reliable source? edit

I'm just curious as to why you say that and wondering if I can convince you otherwise. Shyrangerr 23:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 00:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I understand what you mean. It's just that all three of your arguments deal with very slight possibilities that probably won't happen. Slim chance Hayter was naming names. Slim chance he hasn't recorded lines for every character (or finished them). Slim chance that Jigglypuff could be deleted. Hate having to be 100% sure on Wikipedia and not just %99.999 ~_~ Shyrangerr 00:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 00:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mario kart edit

http://www.gamestop.com/search.asp?N=138+100 heres something thast might help.--DarkFierceDeityLink 23:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

take a chill pill man i never said use it for the articel i was looking at your page n i saw we like the same games n i was trying to help your page and i dont mean to be pickie but on Phantasy Star Universe: Ambition of the Illuminus it sayd 15 days shoul'nt it be 14 days. im just trying to help and be your friend.--DarkFierceDeityLink 23:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
NO prob, hey let me ask you something say if there was going to be another 3rd party player in SSBB who do you think it would be?--DarkFierceDeityLink 23:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
LOL we think alike i was going to say megaman x, I also think NiGHTS will be in there for some reason. if you think about it Megaman X can tellaport on stage just like how Mario comes out a tube.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ness edit

Original Message can be seen Here.DengardeComplaints 08:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I know how to read, thanks. What does Original Research have to do with anything? You are the one bringing up what someone said at GameFAQs. It is right there on the official blog that says "up until now" Ness HAS (past tense) been in the games. You would have to change the definition of some words in order to make it say "Ness has been in the games... and he still is!" LN3000 07:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 08:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
It could easily be described as original research on your part creating doubt on the fact that Ness is gone. AND you've violated the 3RR. You are obviously not thinking right if you go against Wikipolicy for something stupid like this. LN3000 07:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 08:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
The problem with your logic, is that you can't disregard the rules just because you deem it as Original Research. The official blog is not Original Research. If you want to start an edit war, go right ahead. LN3000 08:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 08:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
What you don't seem to understand, then, is that you are JUST as guilty of what you are accusing everyone else of. LN3000 08:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 08:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
My point? Why are you willing to start an edit war over whether you disagree with how the blog is worded? The blog is worded to say that Ness is no longer in the game. You are saying that the blog writer could be mistaken? Or that he is using words that can intentionally be misunderstood? LN3000 08:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 08:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry that I disagree with you. Obviously it will be impossible to show you that you are wrong. Keep further discussion on the article's discussion page instead of cluttering up my talk page. LN3000 08:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 08:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I never wish, nor campaign, to have a fellow member blocked. I think you are enjoying a joke by reporting yourself, (and yes, you were warned in the edit summary about 3RR, FYI) and I think the report is foolish. It is also very frustrating that you continue to label it as OR, which up until now, when you decided that it was. Thank you, goodnight --LN3000 08:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 09:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
You sure do have a sense of humor, lol! You're not bothering me, we are both just trying to do what's best for the article, and unfortunately, there's a disagreement with what is speculation and what is not. To me, the entry IS the concrete proof that Ness is not in the game, for you it's not. And obviously 'wrong' was the wrong choice of word for me before, and I apologize for that. --LN3000 09:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Reply can be seen Here. DengardeComplaints 09:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
In other news... we are obviously both huge Nintendo fans. Maybe we can exchange Wii friend codes, or DS game codes. --LN3000 09:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Haha! We're in the same time zone, then. EDIT: Alright, I got it. Mine is 4958 7267 2207 2296. I didn't think it matters if someone knows someone else's Wii number or not, since they will never bother you, unless you knew their number, too, and had added it. --LN3000 09:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, there's a ton of creeps on the Internet. Take you, for example. :P Anyway, my birthday was Monday, so I forgot to update my userpage. :P I should go to sleep now, but I'd rather stay up and catch those criminal wikipedians who break the 3RR rule, and then get away with it. :D LN3000 09:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, just because we disagree over something, doesn't mean we have to hold resentment against the other person. --LN3000 10:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

3RR edit

I just wanted to stop by and tell you that I feel it was unnecessary to block you. I, however, changed protection level for the article. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 09:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry bro edit

My edit went off at the same time as yours, you hadn't made it when I started the undo. Figures, the first time I try to use Twinkle, it messes up... Coreycubed 17:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re:SSBB Should we add the Dojo edit

Sorry, I did not look in the article. A lot of people may know about the dojo, but some people do not. I was just pointing that out(and I forgot to look in the article itself...). Why did you say "uh, we know that"? In the future please just add a link to where it is in the article.--Smashbrosboy 00:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Keep off my edits. edit

Um, yeah.--91.121.83.168 00:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey friend edit

Is Tales of Symphonia: Knight of Ratatosk a good game I might buy it, from the pictures it looks really good.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

need help edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nights:_Journey_of_Dreams

can fan sites be used for information? i'm trying to explain why they are not but they keep messing with with the page above and I was woundering if you can help?--DarkFierceDeityLink 23:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nights was game for sega its hard to tel you how to play so i'll show you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4cVXqxCVBE
Now on the page for the game some one believes that a "fan page" that some 12-40 year old made is a relieable source and i'm trying to explain that it's not and I would like for to to explain the rules of wiki.--DarkFierceDeityLink 23
57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  1. ^ a b Tawny Ditmer (November 14, 2007). "New NiGHTS-trailer and a lot of new information". GameLegend. Retrieved on November 14, 2007.
  1. ^ a b Tawny Ditmer (November 14, 2007). "NiGHTS delayed again". NiGHTS into Dreams.com. Retrieved on November 14, 2007.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
ok thank you for you help and i'll tell you if he does something wrong.

PS hows Resident Evil: The Umbrella Chronicles i'm thinking about picking Mario Galaxy and Resident evil with the zapper this week.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC) I'll take your word for it i'm getting the zapper for free tho so it wouldn't hurt trying both ways.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC) I live in New York so they said if you buy Mario Galaxy they will give you a free $25 dollar gift card so i figured why not get the zapper and Resident evil.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

NiGHTS edit

That error is a simple typo.
As I've also told DarkFierceDeityLink, and posted on the talk page of the article, what happens here is exactly the same as with the last delay. If it's reported by a reliable source (in this case, DFDL is also mixing up sources, cause this doesn't come from a fansite), it's always accepted. Releasedate information is in the majority of cases first reported by news outlets, sometimes long before on the publisher's official website.

That aside, I've worked hard to get rid of that trivia section, and DFDL just reverts it without even looking at what he's doing. I'm going to put that back, and I look forward to hearing from your judgement on the releasedate.

I look forward to discussing this on proper level. JackSparrow Ninja (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

GameBlaster edit

I see that the zapper is call the GameBlaster now.--DarkFierceDeityLink 01:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mario edit

Hey is it me or are the Luigi levels in galaxy are harder?--DarkFierceDeityLink 21:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

hey can you tell me if this is good i made it myself edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_possibility_of_Survival_of_Romanovs

I need help with the references.--DarkFierceDeityLink 22:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

can you please help me.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
what i tryed to do before was try to fix my Sources i was trying to make it look neat like the one on SSBB. And some of the pictures that i wanted wouldn't let me put it on the page b/c they are too graphic(discusting). But if you see anything else wrong with the page feel free to chnge it.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Final Fantasy XIII, Mr. 33cm edit

It's not speculation about the "unusual relationship" or him being Lightning's bodyguard. It was mentioned in an interview translation (pretty sure it was one of RPGfan's) said by the director, Toriyama. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.59.179.30 (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Final Fantasy XIII, Mr. 33cm, Part 2 edit

Does it work now? I couldn't find the original interview (it links me to another story) but the site I source also credits RPGFan for the original translation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.59.179.30 (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

hey edit

you should see all the changes i have made on SSB the series if it wasnt for me you guy will be seein player from teken on the playable tabale.--DarkFierceDeityLink 20:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC) and unwated iteam list.Reply

B/c its the same moron who keeps adding the stuff on there that person think we are dumb i know its him and i think he needs to be blocked and sockpuppet.--DarkFierceDeityLink 20:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

please look edit

[3]: It seems as that site has a roster but I believe 100% that it is fake b/c were is Zelda it could be a new demo that they were talking about but i really don't believe anything from other sites unless its from Dojo. I just wanted you to look at it.--DarkFierceDeityLink 03:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

HeaveTheClay Keeps taken Ness, Lucairo and jiggly off the list please do somthing about this.--DarkFierceDeityLink 15:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rikara edit

He's not stopping...gonna need to report him I think. -Sukecchi (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I hate to sound like I'm siding with the bad guy (which I am, please don't take offense of it) But it looks like, by the comments I have seen on the talk page, I might say that you're the one who appears to be uncivil, along with the others. Please don't send back any negative comments, but not only it's my opinion, it might be violating others as well. Just keep in mind. ;) Ryou-kun16 (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and Hi. How are you? ^_^ Ryou-kun16 (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 9th edit

Remind me to grab your Friend Code then. Coreycubed (talk) 06:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

8386-5812-2521-7626 Gotta see if my friend's copy of Strikers is still laying around, I'll let you know. Coreycubed (talk) 06:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

friend code edit

may I have your friend code so maybe when we have time we could have a tournament my friend code is on my page.--Lbrun12415 18:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks i'll see you and coreybud on march 9th maybe(I have to see if my friend wants to fight) invite your friends to fight.--Lbrun12415 18:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry I never asked you for your name mine is Luca(Luke in american).--Lbrun12415 18:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
lol thanks i'll see you on March 9th.--Lbrun12415 19:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

new friend code edit

Hey I got a new friend code. My new one is now 2772-8917-0054-3363. May I get your again please. Thank you.--Lbrun12415 01:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Long time no see(talk) edit

How you been man long time no see.--Lbrun12415 21:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not bad, thanks for asking. Just going to college.. I gave away my Wii :( I never had a chance to play you in Brawl..--Lbrun12415 02:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well I didn't give it away.. I sold it to my cousin for $300 with wii sports, spider-man 3, mario kart and Brawl. And yeah i'm in college i would be starting my 2nd year there. when we met I was still in high school. And I'm studying accounting --Lbrun12415 20:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well i'm doing ok I did better last semester then this semester. And i'm only good at math so why not.--Lbrun12415 02:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply