Talk:International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence

edit

Hi, I have responded to your comment. I'm not pushing one POV or another, I'm just highlighting that the article states that Taiwan ISN'T fully independent, and the map in the article states that it IS. I don't care whether it is one or the other: I just care about the differentiation. There are two solutions: 1) Taiwain is independent in the article and on the map and 2) Taiwan isn't independent in the article and on the map. You cannot have one and the other.--Scotchorama (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I just had to react since I know that the treatment of Taiwan is a bit humiliating for the Taiwanese. It should just be regarded as an independent state, and it is really functioning as such. What I am pointing at, is also the fact that it was one of the founding charter members of the UN. Taiwan shall therefore be listed as independent in all levels. I have sometimes to do with Taiwan at my job, and there it is listed as an independent country. What I agree with you is the need for consistency in the article. There are some more examples which would need to reach consistency too. --Den-femte-ryttaren (talk) 16:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply