User talk:DeloarAkram/Archive 1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Vinegarymass911 in topic August 2021

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Prodipto Delwar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:09, Saturday, November 30, 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Prodipto Delwar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:09, Saturday, November 30, 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit

 

Hi Prodipto Delwar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:10, Saturday, November 30, 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Abu Rafi for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Rafi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Rafi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 08:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


Why This Article will be deleted or nominate for deletion?? User:Prodipto Delwar 05:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Prodipto Delwar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Prodipto Delwar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:24, Thursday, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Prodipto Delwar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:24, Thursday, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Prodipto Delwar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:24, Thursday, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

edit

  Hello Prodipto Delwar, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Let us be Muslims have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohit Sarkar

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rohit Sarkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BlameRuiner (talk) 10:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@BlameRuiner Please Back Rohit Sarkar page in my WP:Subpage. Prodipto Deloar (Talk) 10:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
You'll have to write a request at WP:REFUND. I honestly didn't expect that it would be deleted so fast. --BlameRuiner (talk) 10:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@BlameRuiner Its Okey Brother! Thank you for all. Prodipto Deloar (Talk) 10:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit
 

Hello Prodipto Deloar. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mahbubul Alam Hanif, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Prodipto Deloar. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Prodipto Deloar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 11:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 10, edit on Singair Government College

edit

Hello Prodipto, I found that recently you reverted my edit on Singair Government College here. You previously removed it replacing something else and I provided a question for you in this edit. I'd like know, what is the reason that you had to remove Category:Colleges in Bangladesh from the page? ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 02:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Because, This college is situated in Manikganj District. User:Prodipto Delwar 13:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, That category has already been added by you. And let me ask you another silly question. Isn't Manikganj District inside Bangladesh? Please don't revert any further edits like this. Thanks. ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 14:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Schools Netrokona District

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Schools Netrokona District requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mamunul Haque. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Let us be Muslims moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Let us be Muslims, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:M. Shahinoor Rahman has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:M. Shahinoor Rahman. Thanks! Mr-5 / (M 📩 ✉ / C🖋 ) 21:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: M. Shahinoor Rahman has been accepted

edit
 
M. Shahinoor Rahman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mr-5 / M / C🖋 14:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Islamic University Laboratory School & College for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic University Laboratory School & College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic University Laboratory School & College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Setreis (talk) 06:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alauddin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alauddin Firuz Shah. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Institute of Islamic Education and Research, Islamic University for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of Islamic Education and Research, Islamic University, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Islamic Education and Research, Islamic University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Prodipto Deloar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Institute of Islamic Education and Research, Islamic University, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.   // Timothy :: talk  17:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Islamic University, Bangladesh. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Darul Uloom Deoband faculty people

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Darul Uloom Deoband faculty people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Let us be Muslims

edit

  Hello, Prodipto Deloar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Let us be Muslims, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Let us be Muslims

edit
 

Hello, Prodipto Deloar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Let us be Muslims".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete merge proposal

edit

In December 2020, you added merge tags to Department of English, University of Dhaka and University of Dhaka.[1][2] That is step 2 of Wikipedia:Merging. But you skipped step 1: creating a new discussion on Talk:University of Dhaka explaining why you believe the merge would be beneficial. Without such a discussion, nothing is going to happen, and there's no point to the merge tags. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahbubul Alam Hanif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GTV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply