DellzCreationz, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi DellzCreationz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello, DellzCreationz, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks , I hope you understand my editing to the page Iss Pyaar Ko , I have edited it on the basis of an Encyclopedia. And I have edited it on the basis of also as a fan and a editor .

That you asked and then completely ignored the responses is troubling.
 
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

OK thank you Actually it wasn't needed to give any any reference but your convenience.I have provided the reference.   Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sanaya Irani. Thank you.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have updated giving reliable sources on Sanaya Irani Sehgal's page .

  • DellzCreationz, you are again adding unsupported personal information to Sanaya Irani. Wikipedia articles follow WP:COMMONNAME, that is we use the name the subject is most commonly referred to in independent reliable sources. You cannot continue to add "Sehgal" to the article or infobox unless you have reliable sources verifying the use of that name. Note that even if you do include a reliable source, the proper field to include the information is in the "birthname" field. Per the instructions for the name field at Template:Infobox person: "Common name of person (defaults to article name if left blank; provide birth_name (below) if different from name) (emphasis original). When your edits are reverted by others, please ensure you take the time to find out why they were reverted instead of just restoring the disputed content. Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Actually it wasn't needed to give any any reference but your convenience.I have provided the reference.

Yes, it does require a reference. Did you read any of the links to the Wikipedia policy pages I provided? You must provide a reliable source when adding personal information to biography articles. It's not an option. Continuing to do so once the policy is explained to you is about the quickest way to get blocked on Wikipedia outside of blatant vandalism. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 13 July edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  Your addition to Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Diffs: Content you submitted in these edits can be found verbatim at hxxp://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4636757&TPN=6 in a 4 June 2016 post. You also seemed to have missed two giant notices in the article which read: "NOTE: PLOT SUMMARY MAY NOT BE COPIED OR EVEN CLOSELY PARAPHRASED FROM OTHER SOURCES. COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS AND PLAGIARISM WILL NOT BE TOLERATED." Care to explain? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

AN notice edit

  This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply