Hello edit

I hope you will consider getting a real account at some point, rather than editing as an IP. The name of this account could be confusing, since it's not an administrator and can't actually delete anything. I put a note on your user page to that effect. I hope you don't mind. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would strongly urge you to change (or simply abandon, if you're determined to continue to edit as an IP). Not only is it a misleading name, it has strong "single purpose" connotations. Alai (talk) 16:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your (alarmingly) candid reply. I'll be closing your deletion nomination as a speedy keep, then, and taking such further about this account as seems on reflection to be most appropriate. Alai (talk) 16:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
You've either misunderstood the nature of my comment, or are deliberately misusing the word "threat". I suggest you review WP:USERNAME and WP:SPA if you're genuinely mystified as to the nature of my concerns. Alai (talk) 16:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
And it seems to me you've likewise "satisfied the requirements" for being blocked as an SPA, and having your nominations closed on that basis. Am I "encouraging" you in the right direction enough yet? Alai (talk) 16:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

As you said, there are both advantages and disadvantages to anonymous editing. If you wish to edit as an IP, and use this account to nominate articles for AFD, that's your prerogative. Your two nominations so far are above any reproach. The wording on this user page seems fine to me now, and should reduce confusion. Best regards, — Carl (CBM · talk) 16:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

blocked for username edit

 
The account with this username has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because of concerns that the chosen username may not meet our username policy.
This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:

  1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. Keep in mind, though, that creating a new account is much faster and easier.
Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Gwen Gale (talk) 17:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply