Hello Deh and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

edit

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Highest Point in Austin

edit

I've been misinformed! What is the highest point in Austin??? - Thanks Nv8200p 18:20, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Puppy-destroying

edit

YOU ARE A DESTROYER OF PUPPIES (please don't delete comments that you disagree with) 203.112.19.195 04:18, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

You forgot to mention that I kick cats and eat babies. Deh 14:17, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thx for the heads-up about the anon deleting talk page comments. I was out of town for a couple days but I've reverted his vandalism. I'll continue to do so as long as necessary.—chris.lawson (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Williamson County

edit

Messing up that link was purely accidental. I cannot even figure out how I did it. I corrected it. -Sorry Nv8200p talk 15:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I must have been editing your previous version and saved that accidently. That's the only thing I can figure. -Nv8200p talk 15:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

River Oaks, TX

edit

I remember seeing Pflugerville ISD mentioned in River Oaks' website. Let me check again. WhisperToMe 23:13, 6 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

EDIT: Yes, it's Castleberry. I must have been confused... WhisperToMe 23:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

NRHP listing for the Cathedral Church of Saint Matthew

edit

Hello, and thanks for the compliment! Writing an article is much more difficult than I had thought when I began this project! I love the dear old cathedral. It is a great place.

The category I chose was Registered Historic Places in Texas. When I found that category, I did not see the distinction that this is for national listings only. For example, Lubbock High School is listed there, so I assumed this category was for any kind of historic registry. The cathedral is listed on the Texas Historical Commission - not the national. Here is the Texas link:

http://atlas.thc.state.tx.us/common/viewform.asp?atlas_num=5113006861

Could you clarify for me, then, if Registered Historic Places in Texas is strictly for national listings for Texas places? If so, certainly let's edit the article accordingly.

Speaking of categories, I have a question for you, if you don't mind. Oher Wiki folks delete some categories. The way I have found categories is to look at other articles and see how they are categorised. If I feel my article fits that category, I add it to my article. I identified all of these categories:

Category:Cathedrals in the United States Category:Episcopal cathedrals of the United States Category:Anglican cathedrals Category:Cathedrals Category:Episcopal churches in the United States Category:Churches in Texas Category: Dallas landmarks Category:Registered Historic Places in Texas Category:List of Registered Historic Places in Texas Category:Religion in Texas

So given that people are deleting the categories, how do I determine if there is a fit or not? Is there an explanation for each category somewhere, or do we just go by the title? If the title, then I don't understand the deletions. I would be grateful for your guidance on this. Is there a limit to the number of categories one should have?

Thank you for the clean-up edits, especially the link to the THC. I couldn't figure out how to get it to go exactly there.

I appreciate your help very much! I'll make a small article for the Diocese of Dallas (see that nice little red link on the cathedral page) and I hope you will look at it as well.

Sarum blue 15:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very kindly again! Yes, it would be fantastic if, at your convenience, you would construct and populate a list of Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks from the THC Atlas. I am enjoying Wikipedia and learning more about it every day. It is just amazing. Sarum blue 13:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for closing the link! I wrote an article for the Episcopal Diocese of Dallas today. It's rather short. Take a look if you wish...and maybe look at the Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth. It has some very ugly text I think. Sarum blue 14:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Smackbot Suggestion

edit

Thanks so much for the suggestion about using Smackbot to add 'US' to the census articles. I have been in touch with the robot's owner and he's going to do it. Your suggestion has saved me much time. Thank you! Henry Maustrauser 11:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hell's Angels are Trolls - not teenagers...

edit

Interestingly enough most teenagers who's parents have recently moved into a new neighborhood fit the description of a "troll" by being "someone who comes into an established community..." and makes "...inflammatory, rude or offensive..." remarks "...designed to annoy and antagonize the existing members [of the community] or disrupt the flow of discussion..." traffic or anything else that is in their way. Please be mindful that in the majority of cases such behavior is simply the result of making the transition from one community into another and is relatively temporary and therefore does not fit into the same catagory as when the Hell's Angels ride through town. -- PCE 00:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Okay, but what are you talking about? Deh 01:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

FM and RM

edit

I didn't realize the RM roads were using the same infobox, I've re-added the variables. I ought to assume, since they are sharing an info/succession box, that there is no number shared by an FM road and an RM road? If there's even one such case, I'd recommend a separate prev/next system. — May. 26, '06 [05:05] <freak|talk>

Nevermind. That question has already been answered at Template talk:TxFMBox. — May. 26, '06 [05:11] <freak|talk>

RE: Anderson Mill

edit

Thanks for the tip on the differences between the Anderson Mill CDP and the Anderson Mill listed in the Handbook of Texas. You're right about the sometimes misleading double nature of CDP names and Wikipedia's shortcomings in dealing with those -- I ran into that with Canyon Lake, Texas (the CDP) and Canyon Lake (Texas) (the lake). At any rate, I'll double check before making the CDP/HoT connection from now on. Thanks again, and take care. --JFreeman 04:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Farm to Market Road 60
SEMATECH
Fletcher Stockdale
Pango
Edward Burleson
Bitstream Inc.
Elisabet Ney
José Antonio Navarro
Joseph D. Sayers
D'Hanis, Texas
Texian
Medina Valley
Pendleton Murrah
Wingdings 3
U.S. Route 290
Pearson, Texas
Wingdings 2
Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation
Pompeo Coppini
Cleanup
William B. Travis High School
Word processor
Classical order
Merge
Linotype
Mojibake
Texas Rangers Hall of Fame
Add Sources
Harriett, Texas
Mayde Creek High School
Kimberly Tomes
Wikify
Uberaba
Mads Vinding
Frederick Baron
Expand
Montague, Texas
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center
Fear

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

James Wilson

edit

I think you should leave Wikipedia; this edit shows you have far too much common sense to be of use here. Please leave it to the pimple-faced ones and the cranks. +ILike2BeAnonymous 05:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup tag on Texas 45

edit

A new system is being implemented to replace {{cleanup-txsh}} using the to-do list and a parameter in the WikiProject banner on the talk page due to heavy views against custom cleanup templates. Therefore, please do not use cleanup-txsh from this point. Thank you. master sonT - C 15:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I see. I saw the changes on the talk page, but it wasn't clear to me from your article edit summary that it was a replacement. Thank you for explaining. Deh 18:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of All USRD Clean-up Templates

edit

All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master sonT - C 16:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Williamson County tx seal.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Williamson County tx seal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Deh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Deh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Deh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Williamson County tx seal.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Williamson County tx seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 04:48, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply