Deadlyhallows
Welcome! edit
Hello, Deadlyhallows, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Deadlyhallows, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Deadlyhallows edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Deadlyhallows, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kasstech edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Kasstech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 09:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Blocked edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. – Athaenara ✉ 09:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Deadlyhallows (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Appeal of ban: Please kindly recons Deadlyhallows (talk) 11:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You would need to actually address the reason for your block and provide a convincing reason for reconsideration. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please, i was only testing out something. I know that wikipedia does not encourage ads, i am not writing or promoting a particular organization, i just beg that you consider the ban, i am sorry, and i assure you that this will never repeat itself again. I will abide by the rules of the community. Once again, the post i posted was a mistake, i take fully responsibility for my actions. Please unblock me so i can share meaningful content with the community. Thank You. @AthanaraDeadlyhallows (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Review The Ban edit
Please I am not aware at the time that this would happen . I respect the community policies... The post was not meant to be on Wikipedia fully, it was a test run... I am so sorry and if given the opportunity again, I will not repeat this action. Kindly consider me. Thank you 😫 Deadlyhallows (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Please review the ban edit
Deadlyhallows (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please, i was only testing out something. I know that wikipedia does not encourage ads, i am not writing or promoting a particular organization, i just beg that you consider the ban, i am sorry, and i assure you that this will never repeat itself again. I will abide by the rules of the community. Once again, the post i posted was a mistake, i take fully responsibility for my actions. Please unblock me so i can share meaningful content with the community. Thank You. Deadlyhallows (talk) 14:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm not sure how you can claim that you were not promoting a particular organization when that's exactly what you were doing from what I can see. To be unblocked, you will need to detail any relationship that you have with Kasstech, including reviewing conflict of interest and paid editing. If you have no further intention of editing about Kasstech, that's a start, but you will then need to state what productive contributions you want to make to Wikipedia, such as what articles or topic areas you are interested in editing. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.