Dchaggis
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Azoria Project, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.unc.edu/~dchaggis.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Azoria, Azoria Project
editHello; welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for all the information you've added on this site and this project. Some of the content, unfortunately, did remain too close to the ecu page for us to retain. As advised above, even if you are the original author, we need a licensing verification to use their content. A very little bit has had to be removed pending that. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure for verifying that license, if you choose.
The "welcome" notice above contains some links that may be of assistance to you as you continue to work on this that can help bring it into line with Wikipedia's specific style guide. I have made a few changes, such as removing embedded external links and use of bold type that does not correspond to our style. (We use bold sparingly, primarily in the first use of a subject's name and in some list items.)
More sweepingly, I have also merged the two articles together. Until the article on Azoria reaches significant size, it is probably best to keep the information contained in a single article, unless there is substantial coverage on the project itself rather than on the site. Our goal is to make notable subjects easily accessible for readers. Unless readers are likely to be researching the project independently (in which case it would meet notability guidelines on its own), it is likely to be of most use to them in context of reading about the site. We do separate out notable subtopics of this sort when articles become too long to comfortably navigate, but this one has a ways to go yet. :) See Wikipedia:Article size.
Again, I appreciate your work here. Presuming that you are the "Haggis, D.C." mentioned in the bibliography, I should also notify you of our conflict of interest guidelines. We ask contributors who are closely connected to subjects on which they work to exercise particular caution in sourcing. As a publicly edited encyclopedia without peer review process, we try to maintain reliability by making all of our information verifiable, citing previously published sources. While it may seem counterintuitive, we can't publish your firsthand observations until you've first published them elsewhere. (See WP:NOR.)
If you have any questions, you're welcome to come by my talk page, which can be reached by following the link after my username. We also have a volunteer-staffed help desk at WP:HELP and a page especially for new contributors at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)