=

Stacey B. Day edit

You blanked this article with the comment "I have removed this article", and another editor then tagged it for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G7 "Author requests deletion". However, that only applies if there is no substantial content from other authors, and in this case others had originated the article and worked on it before you. I have therefore declined the speedy-deletion request and restored the article to its state before you blanked it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hagakure Society edit

 

The article Hagakure Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2009. Notability doubtful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply