Dave12121212, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 

Hi Dave12121212! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)


Tyllus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tyllus, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyllus (April 20)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyllus has been accepted

 
Tyllus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chronos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Family Tree of the Orphic gods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aither.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greek Primordial Gods

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Greek Primordial Gods requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PopePompus (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Chrysus (disambiguation)

Hi Dave12121212, I have edited Chrysus (disambiguation) per MOS:DAB. I commented out Asclepiad (title) because (1) it's not mentioned in any article, and (2) references aren't used on disambiguation pages. All entries on a DAB page should be mentioned in an article. If you would like to add Asclepiad (title) to an existing article, that article could then be added to Chrysus (disambiguation) to back up Asclepiad (title). Leschnei (talk) 12:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Thankyou  :) Dave12121212 (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ester Macrì for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ester Macrì is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ester Macrì until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 08:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome

Hi Dave. You might find Wikiproject: Classical Greece and Rome of interest. It is the closest thing Wikipedia has to project covering Greek mythology. Regards, Paul August 17:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, went to join, apparently I've already done so at some point in the past. Dave12121212 (talk) 01:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Graeae into Thalassa. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok. It was actually copied from Pontus. Thankyou for letting me know about this, I was previously unaware. I will provide attribution in future. — Dave12121212 ◎ 03:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Also, I did not realise this applied for family trees, too. I see people frequently copy and pasting them from article to article with nothing more than an edit summary of "added family tree" or "genealogy section" or something. — Dave12121212 ◎ 00:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
I assume that what I did here was fine? — Dave12121212 ◎ 09:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Orsinoe for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orsinoe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orsinoe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 15:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

 

Hi Dave12121212! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notifications from talk pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eumenides.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)