User talk:Darkness Shines/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 9

Thanks!

for your cooperation and willingess to listen. Dougweller (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

ARBCOM Notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Anonimu and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Codrin.B (talk) 02:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:University of Pristina/RfC: split proposal

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:University of Pristina/RfC: split proposal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Leon Jordan AfD

Leon Jordan was a member of the Missouri General Assembly when he was assassinated in 1970, and meets WP:POLITICIAN on that basis alone. In addition, he was considered the most powerful politician in Missouri, his murder is unsolved, and the case has been discussed in reliable sources for decades. Did you read the references? Please reconsider. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your prompt response and I appreciate your withdrawal. I did a minor expansion last night and will do more work on it tonight. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Rape during the Bangladesh liberation war

You've made some really significant improvements to the article, especially on the prose. Concerning POV, I will try and sort out the issues myself. I think it is difficult for you to see the points where you are writing from your POV and not a neutral one. I personally agree with your POV (the Pakistanis attracted atrociously) but we need to leave such judgements to the reader. The topic is interesting, and I think it would be great if we could collaborate to get the article to GA status. Thanks. --He to Hecuba (talk) 23:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Wonderful, I look forward to working with you. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, give me some time to review the source material and I'll start writing. Also, I tend to make BIG BOLD CHANGES EVERYWHERE in article space, so don't be afraid of reverting anything I do, because content hammered out after discussion tends to be better than the first thing which comes into my head. Great =). --He to Hecuba (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Darkness Shines and He to Hecuba. I've put the GOCE request for this article on hold to give you time to deal with the content issues. It isn't removed, and not put back in the ques, just on hold. Please would you put a note at WP:GOCE/REQ#Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War when you've done with content issues, and I'll remove the hold and (if still wanted) do a copy edit. Best, --Stfg (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Occupy Wall street

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Occupy Wall street. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

El Talismán

A registered editor restored deleted content. I'd revert it, but I don't want to get involved in a edit warring dispute again. Platinum Star (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Arora

Re: the Risley ref that you have just added - Herbert Hope Risley is not a reliable source for racial stuff. He was, indeed, a scientific racist and his theories have been blown out of the water. - Sitush (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Had not noticed it was that fellow, have self reverted. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

That's ok. It is a common event. The man was a nutjob, although highly thought of until, oh, about 24 hours after he died. - Sitush (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I meant to thank you earlier for your help with the Haven Herefords thing. There is probably enough there now to ensure that the article is not deleted, although there remain big swathes of uncited content. - Sitush (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Not a problem, as I said, once upon a time I was a farmer and that particular herd is quite famous. I have written to some relatives to see if they still have copies of the old farmers journals. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Proposing site ban for Darkness Shines. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, I think I shall pass on the drama. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I have started another subsection regarding an interaction ban between you and Top Gun where, if approved, can result in blocks if any interaction is initiated between you two. Top Gun is supporting this proposal. You can find this directly underneath the section stated above.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 518,375,168) 01:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Never mind. Forgot you already answered there.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 518,375,409) 01:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

RFC at talk:Pakistan

Don't want to clutter up the RFC header and don't want to get too much involved into the subject. Therefore I leave a response to your comment here. If it is about the notability of the source the RFC should've been drafted somehow like this:
Is the Failed States Index by Fund for Peace published by Foreign Policy notable enough to be included in this article or not?
Just my thought as it seems to be just about that and the current RFC title can be confusing for editors not already familiar with the past discussions. Thanks for your clarification tho. TMCk (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Darkness Shines. You have new messages at WP:ANI.
Message added 02:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calabe1992 02:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback 2

Hello, Darkness Shines. You have new messages at JCAla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JCAla (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

During the copy edit ...

Hi Darkness Shines. Thanks for noticing my comments and responding to them. The way I like to work is to put the {{GOCEinuse}} box at the top of the article while I'm editing, and to replace it with {{under construction}} overnight or if I'm taking a significant break. While the inuse box is there, please could you avoid editing, so that we can avoid edit conflicts? Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Of course, sorry about that. Further issues you post I will respond solely on the talk page. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

No worries, thanks. While the {{under construction}} box is there, it's fine to edit. I just want us to avoid edit conflicts. Best, --Stfg (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:European Union

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:European Union. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Human Rights Abuses

Template:Infobox Human Rights Abuses has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. mabdul 09:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Interaction ban

Hello Darkness Shines, with this edit, in enacting a consensus of the community reached at the Administrator's Noticeboard, I hereby inform you that you are banned from

• interacting with TopGun
• undoing his edits
• making reference to or commenting on him or his actions
• replying to him in any discussion
• editing his user talk space
• filing WP:ANI reports about him except to clarify or abolish this interaction ban or to report violations of the interaction ban.

The discussion leading to the ban may be viewed here. Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 18:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

State Sponsored terrorism

I was going through the article and subsection on India and added a line acc to the source "without evidence" later came to the talk page to see a lot of discussion on that. Feel free to update my edit. --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 11:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	for continuous fight against vandals and POV pushers, and helping Wiki retain its neutral face. Keep up the good work ÐℬigXЯaɣ 11:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, regarding the article you mentioned above, it needs a lot of work doing to it. I will look it over when time allows. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Blog refs

Hi there, I was just wondering on what basis you've been removing all blog references from the Ghulam Azam page - there is no blanket prohibition on using such references on Wikipedia, as far as I'm aware? In particular, the Eric Avebury statement is available on his own blog here: http://ericavebury.blogspot.com/2011/07/bangladesh.html. Let me know.

Abbasfirnas887 (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your reply (I'm never sure whether I should respond on your talk page or mine)! The BLP policy says:

Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.

and

Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject (see below).

This seems to me clear on the point that material from blogs *on the living person* himself/herself is not allowed - but those references weren't on the person, as far as I'm aware. They were concerned with the ICT as an institution.

Abbasfirnas887 (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The article is a BLP so extra caution has to be taken. The ICT is also about living people as are those being tried, blogs will not cut it as sources. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Carmel School Giridih

DS Thanks for providing the sources. Please note that the Correct and official name of the school is Carmel School, Giridih since it is a convent school often in media and newspapers it is named as Carmel Convent School , regards --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 17:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

• i have given sources specific to Carmel School Giridih as there are many Carmel SChools in the World check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmel_School_(disambiguation) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmel_(disambiguation) --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 18:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that, were I am from all convent schools are names as s"school name" convent school. I had assumed all catholic schools worldwide would follow the same naming patterns. Feel free to move it back. 19:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

• I will wait for the discussion at AFD to conclude. Its amusing to see that Only TG believes that the article needs to be deleted. Though I am not familiar with the process of moving a page, will try to learn it, or contact you if need be. thanks--ÐℬigXЯaɣ 09:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Your interaction ban with TopGun at AN/I again

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pseudofusulina (talk) 02:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Periyar (river).

Hi, Please let me know why was the Periyar (river) article change reverted?Pearll's Sun^TALK 15:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Thought that was obvious from the edit summary, you appear to have ownership issues. All your edits appear to be reverts back to yourself. It is also obvious that the river source is Kerala and not as you seem to think Sundaramala, I will post on the talk page presently. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I have added Sundaramala as the source after verifying and adding multiple references on the article and its talk page. Please show me a reference where it says that the exact location of its source is in Kerala?Pearll's Sun^TALK 16:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I already did, on the article talk page were this discussion belongs. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

There was not a source to say that the river originates from kerala, And please edit the article after providing the suitable reference for the same. Pearll's Sun^TALK 16:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I will edit the article any time I bloody well want to. I already gave a source. Discuss this on the talk page of the article and stop wasting my time. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:International recognition of South Sudan

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:International recognition of South Sudan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Good Samaritan Medical Center (West Palm Beach)

• Quick note, there was no need to mark that for speedy deletion. New editor was clearly trying to create an article on a notable topic, he ended up getting blocked temporarily due to trying to battle CSD tag. Cheers.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

ISI RfC

Hi DarknessShines. I reverted your reversion of DeltaQuad's closure. The matter has been discussed in the previous RfC so I suggest you either wait a bit before trying again or use some other means of dispute resolution. Also, you might want to use an arm's length approach to your interaction with TopGun for the time being. Just a suggestion. --regentspark (comment) 13:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

GA articles

Cheers DS, I have had an article on the GA nomination list for some time now. What about you review my article and I review yours. At the GA, they say it is explicitly allowed to say "you review mine, I review yours". What do you say? JCAla (talk) 14:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good to me, which article is your one? Also look on the talk page for the guild of copy editors comments. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes, will do. Mine is Amrullah Saleh. I will have to temporarily replace some images if you review the article, as they were nominated by Rawalpindi for deletion on commons, if you know what I mean. ;) BTW, I already adjusted the article to a prior peer review and let a copy-editor check for language. JCAla (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Looking over it now, will post issues as I find them on the talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Darkness Shines and JCAla. Just a word to let you know that I agree with the deletion of File:Amrullah Saleh.png; it doesn't look like it is public domain. It might be a good idea to remove the questionable image from the article and not put it back until the deletion discussion has closed. Regards, -- Dianna (talk) 23:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Diannaa, kindly look at the preceding discussion on commons. Moby Group (owning Tolonews) itself states that it is "100% Afghan owned and operated". Mohseni is an Afghan citizen. Also look at what Liliana had to say here. JCAla (talk) 07:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indigenous peoples

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indigenous peoples. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

For Providing sources and help in saving Carmel School Giridih from AFD, cheers ! ! ! ÐℬigXЯaɣ 22:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, obviously you know I like a Beer Darkness Shines (talk) 22:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

well actually i was in doubt while offering you an alcoholic drink ;) but then i followed wp:BOLD. is some beer still left in the mug ? --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 18:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Taliban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Armitage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:World Without Nazism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:World Without Nazism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Using a reference more than once.

Hi Darkness Shines. I've noticed a mistake you keep making, which I've been having to correct in my copy edits. When you make a reference like this:

<ref name=Fred>details, details, details</ref>

then when you use the same reference a second time, you've been repeating the definition with all the details. This is wrong. What you should do the second time is just this:

<ref name=Fred/>

Take a look at this diff for an example.

While I'm here, "the abuses were only stopped by the intervention of the Indian armed forces" is not obvious and did need citation. I understand why you did that edit summary, but it was wrong and quite rude. Historical facts may be well known or poorly known, depending on the readership, but they are never "obvious". In fact, this bit of history is poorly remembered in the west, even by those old enough to have been able to read newspapers when it happened. To the younger generation of westerners, it's all but unknown. Requests for citations need to be met.

Keep well and take care. --Stfg (talk) 11:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Doing the references as you have means the correct page numbers will not show. Or am I missing something? Darkness Shines (talk) 11:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

The page numbers are still there. Different page numbers need different refs, like your ref name=Totten2 and ref name=Totten3, but for each page, you only define the ref once, and then you use the slash notation for later occurrences. Take a look for yourself at how I've corrected refs Totten2 (page 248) and Totten3 (page 250) and see how the page numbers are still there. --Stfg (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

OK will do as you suggest in future, assuming I bother anymore of course, I am pissed off with constantly being blocked for nothing. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three days for violating your interaction ban here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Block increased to a week due to this personal attack. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

(ec)I self reverted and you still put it up to a week? Darkness Shines (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I increased your block before you self-reverted. I am willing to reduce it back to three days, however, if you apologise. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Of course I am sorry, I would not have reverted it otherwise. Time stamps show you increased the block at the same time as I reverted. I will also be appealing the block as it was not the second violation of an IBAN nor was it an infarction at all. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I have re-imposed the original block. I think you were most definitely violating your interaction ban: you were blatantly trying to game your restriction. But, of course, you're welcome to appeal my block. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

No I was not, I was raising a legitimate concern, but thanks for assuming good faith. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

In fact this was gaming the system[1] Copying and pasting content I had written to user space and then getting a gullible admin to restore a deleted article with my content change is gaming the system, as I can now no longer edit that article. Pure genius you lot. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not violated the interaction ban. Sal seems to think I have done so twice, I have not. Sending an article to AFD is not an WP:IBAN violation. Nor is this[2] an IBAN violation. I did not name him, I did not refer to his edits and as can be seen here[3] I was trying to avoid mentions of he who must not be named at all costs. I see no other way I could have asked that question on the BLP board. And if asking about a BLP violation is an interaction violation then how am I meant to raise such query's in the future? I have not violated the IBAN as laid down under the policy, and I request this block be lifted. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Do you seriously think that referring to a user by an evasive term like "He who must not be named" instead of by username somehow doesn't count as referring to him? The interaction ban says "making reference to or commenting on him or his actions", not "making reference to or commenting on him or his actions by name". You certainly did make reference to, and commented on, him and his actions. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

‎ Merger?

If you return to my talk page and look at the thread just above yours, you will see the answer. Nyttend (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

That is not an answer, you restored an article which had under gone AFD to mainspace, you merged it with another article and it is full of OR, most of it fails verification, and it is not possible now for me to edit the article to correct your hideous mistake. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

You asked why I did it, and what I said is a sufficient reason to understand why I did it. Kindly avoid dragging me into your dispute; I acted because I'm neutral in your dispute, and you'll notice that the only content edit I made was removing some templates that are inappropriate out of userspace. Nyttend (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Haha, that's a funny story. What do you call it if an AFD leads to a deletion of an article based on the OR of the content, you then restore it in your sandbox and let an admin move it back into an article. Very funny. But I still do not get the reason why it was done. JCAla (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

That's know as gaming the system, do not expect an admin to admit he fucked up, none of them ever do. My block log is proof of that. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I have checked the article's logs and it appears it was never deleted. Could you please provide a link to the AfD which ended in deletion, please? Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

You are looking at the wrong article, [4] This one was deleted. It was saved in user space and has now been merged into Pro-Pakistan sentiment which I created in good faith, not as a preemptive strike as has been alluded to. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I have left a note on Nyttend's talk page; however, Captain Screebo (talk · contribs) has been pruning the article since you posted that thread on BLPN. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

So what? He will just get reverted down the road, and still I am unable to edit an article I created. It still has OR both the Music and Displays of sentiment have no place in an article, it is just made up crap. The entire lede is unsourced apart from two neologisms which fail verification, usage of a word is not a definition, and those terms are being defined now by Wikipedia. Pure horseshit is what it is. I had begun the article, used academic sources and would have expanded it correctly, now it is and will remain a mess. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, for one thing, even if the article is that bad, you are not the only one who can make it better. Captain Screebo can improve it and even nominate it for deletion again, if the article cannot be bettered. Furthermore, Nyttend can also be convinced to undo his history merge – flies, honey, vinegar and all that, you know. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I think TopGun did game the system and DS went for the wrong measure. If he promises to you to ask at ANI the next time about what he should do in such cases, would you unblock him? Others should then check whether the sources back the claims etc. JCAla (talk) 14:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

(ec)If I had not asked on the BLP board about it (you know the question you have blocked me for) Then who exactly would have fixed it? I have been following the discussion on the other talk pages, first and foremost please correct my spelling error which has propagated all over the place.I refer to the section headers[5] ;o) Also explain to the quite confused Nyttend as to why I am now unable to edit an article I created, any edit I make to that article will be a revert of what was merged, hence a violation of the IBAN. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes. As a note, "Pakophilia" is a neologism for "Pro-Pakistan sentiment". JCAla (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Even more amusing I saw you removed "Dal Khor" well done as it is not supported by the references at all, a point I had made in the AFD for the same term, dunno why I bother truth be told, some editors are allowed to do as they wish while those who work to improve articles using the best sources available keep getting bitch slapped. I am coming to the conclusion that editing Wikipedia is a terrible waste of time and energy. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblock II

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No I do not think "He who must not be named" is referring to him, it is in fact the opposite. I did not comment on his actions, as I pointed out in the diff[6] I edited my post to try and not refer to him. If this has been a deliberate violation on my part I would accept this block, it was not. I have written "He who must not be named" at ANI and nobody said it was a violation FFS. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately "he who is currently blocked" continues to refer to the other editor in an WP:IBAN. This block should be longer, however, the terms are clear: you cannot refer to them by nicknames or whatever (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(ec)JamesBWatson said that was the reason for declining my request? How the hell am I to clarify that without writing it again? As usual admins close ranks against the plebs and refuse to admit they are wrong. I am done. I will log out and edit in future from an IP. All having an account gets you is shite from nationalist POV pushers who play games. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I think only Salvio could possibly unblock you (if he wants to), if you make a productive suggestion on future behavior to him. :) But don't know if he actually will. It's, however, worth a try. JCAla (talk) 17:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

There were fuck all wrong with my behavior, I did not violate the IBAN, I did not game the fucking system, and every time I have been blocked on this excuse for a fucking encyclopedia is because one person, just one, has done his utmost to have me blocked. His fan club are now calling for a topic ban as well. Like I wrote above, from now on I will edit from an IP. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Ha, was searching for where they propose the topic ban for you and came to this. Man, this guy got nerves. Sorry, you are not allowed to comment on this, forgot. :/ JCAla (talk) 17:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Really don't see why not, after all I am quite certain I was being referred to on Talk:Pro-Pakistan sentiment. No doubt that will further anger our overlords who will now extend the block. Heaven forbid one ever admits he was wrong. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblock III

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not intentionally violated the IBAN, I posted "what I am not allowed to say" at ANI and nobody there said this was a violation. Now that I know it is I will refrain from saying it again. A three day block for a mistake is obscene. Please unblock me. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I want to believe you and, therefore, I am about to unblock you. But, please, please, please in future avoid referring to TopGun's actions at all costs, either by mentioning him directly or by using periphrases. You are supposed to ignore him, no matter what he does. If he violates Wikipedia's policies, there are many other editors who can called him out. You just ignore him. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Holy crap, I did not expect this Sal you just restored my faith in the admin class, thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

'Oh happy day'

"Negotiators for insurgent group say head of former Islamic Emirate should be guardian of future Afghan state - Taliban negotiators involved in ongoing talks in Doha are seeking dramatic constitutional changes which would make Mullah Muhammad Omar Afghanistan's supreme religious and political leader ... “In essence,” a European diplomat familiar with the talks told The Hindu, “the Taliban want that Mullah Omar become a kind of guardian-figure for the Afghan state, not dissimilar to Iran's maghame rahbari, or supreme leader.”"

Pindi lost its mind. JCAla (talk) 08:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Everyone has if this ever went ahead, but it never will, I can see the drones circling from here. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Dunno, NATO wants out of Afghanistan and Obama wants to win an election - although this is certainly not the way. JCAla (talk) 08:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Yanks will not pull out till they have the last of the top guys, Omar has been on the shitlist for a long time now. Obama has already lost the election, and there are not enough time to pull the troops out at any rate. But if this went ahead we will be back in that godforsaken land again in a few years. 08:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey, asked three more things in the review. The final questions after I made a second review as far as I can see now. Sorry, not trying to give you a hard time. :) JCAla (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I would rather it were done right , a through review leads to an improved work. Currently viewing my e-copy of Adam Jones book, I had not thought to look in my personal library, D'oh!. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Answered on the GA review. Two of the three things still in discussion then, I think, we are good to go. JCAla (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

my demons have returned to haunt me. Will respond later when the drink has wreaked its havoc, fare thee well. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Salam, dear friend, seek some help if demons are haunting you into drinking. And they might go away. :) JCAla (talk) 16:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh happy day II. It has already started. JCAla (talk) 06:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Bunch of priests whining, nothing new there really. Not surprised with Karzai's implicit endorsement, he has been pro Taliban from the get go really. I reckon every woman in Afghanistan should just up and move, lets see how superior the men are with none around. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Referencing

Can you let me know if I got it right this time around [7] Thanks Darkness Shines (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Not right yet, I'm afraid. Your Jones reference is only used once. You don't need to change the name every time. First, it's essential for you to read and understand Wikipedia:Citing sources#Repeated citations. Then in the references section of your article, look at footnote 15. The superscripted a and b point to the two places in the article that cite Dictionary of Genocide page 34. You'll see that they are both at the bottom of the "Background" section. Now look at the bottom of the "Background" section in the edit window to see how it does this. It refers to "ref name=Totten" twice. On one occasion it gives all the details like this:

<ref name=Totten>{{cite book|last=Totten|first=Samuel|title=Dictionary of Genocide: A-L|publisher=Greenwood|location=Volume 1|isbn=978-0-313-32967-8|coauthors=Paul Robert Bartrop, Steven L. Jacobs|page=34}}</ref>

and it is this that tells wikipedia how to make the footnote. The other time it just says this:

<ref name=Totten/>

This uses the same reference, but doesn't tell wikipedia the details all over again, because it knows them already. Notice the slash after "Totten". That's what tells wikipedia to use the definition given elsewhere. Hope this helps. --Stfg (talk) 10:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

But hod does Wiki know which page number to show? This is very very confusing Darkness Shines (talk) 10:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Because you've told it. Look at the "Cite book" template above. It has "page=34" in it. :) --Stfg (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Bangladesh Rape talk page

Darkness Shines. It was completely out of order for you do do that removal. First, the SPI for Highstakes00 is still open. Secondly, you also removed comments of mine, and I am in good standing. Thirdly, sockpuppetry is not one of the reasons listed at WP:TPO for removing talk page content, so you have no excuse to do that. If there is a reason to remove any of it, an admin should decide it. You have no authority over what other people are allowed to do and say on wikipedia. Please don't try to exercise any. --Stfg (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I was not trying to get people to "Respect my authori-tah!" I thought comments by sockpuppets were meant to be removed. Sorry for my mistake. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

No worries, thanks. --Stfg (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Falun Gong

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falun Gong. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

AN/I notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Must be longer sal, demons are running the show, Darkness Shines (talk) 19:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

GA

Congratulations DS, I have passed the article as a good article. Whatever the reasons you wrote it, be assured its language is not politicized and it serves a good purpose of informing people about what happened to these people in Bangladesh. JCAla (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree with that. It's an outstanding article on a very difficult topic. --Stfg (talk) 12:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Get well!

JCAla (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Frederick "Rick" Barton

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frederick "Rick" Barton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

GA acknowledgement

File:Liberation montage.png	GA Award!
	Thank you for all the work you did in making Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War a Good Article; your work is much appreciated! All the best, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

That article is indeed good stuff, despite the aggro that you had. Glad to see you back and I hope that the hangover was not too severe. It is never a good idea to edit a website when drunk ;) - Sitush (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I suspect the hangover will last a week, and I deserve it, stupid to go on such a bender at my age. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Darkness Shines. Thanks for what you put on my user page. I don't deserve it and was tempted to take it off, but I'm going to keep it there to celebrate our collaboration. I hope to do it again some time. P.S. a good remedy for a hangover is a vitamin B tablet washed down with a glass of orange juice :) Take care, --Stfg (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Intellectual property activism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Intellectual property activism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Darkness Shines. You have new messages at Ironholds's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Do not

Undo my edits. Do I have to say it in a different language for you to understand? Stop undoing my edits. Contribute your content independently. Mar4d (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Try and do as the fucking inuse template says, and stay off this talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

How about you shelve the idea of contributing to this article altogether? It's already apparent that this wasn't your idea to begin with and that you came in uninvited. Since it's also becoming clear that you're making this article a playground for your edit warring mentality and POV, I don't see any chances of getting along. Mar4d (talk) 13:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

How about you get lost? What part of stay off my talk page did you not get? I will contribute to any article I wish, I started the article as it were obvious you would turn it into a stick to beat India, and what a shock that is exactly what you are doing. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Be assured that I will not let this article turn into the POV-coatrack propaganda crap that you intend to turn it into. I think your statement I started the article as it were obvious you would turn it into a stick to beat India says a lot about your intentions. Mar4d (talk) 14:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Last time, stay the fuck of this talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ushuaia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ushuaia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dru of Id (talk) 16:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Block proposal

A block proposal has been initiated at AN/I. You may wish to participate in it.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 521,558,913) 15:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposal

If I am proven wrong I myself will re add the stuff I reverted I promise NerosRevenge (talk) 20:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Do send me some information of the outcomes I am off to sleep sweet dreams NerosRevenge (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Darkness Shines. You have new messages at Talk:Rape_in_Indian-administered_Kashmir#Dispute_resolution_noticeboard_request.
Message added 22:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TransporterMan (TALK) | DR goes to Wikimania! 22:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Jagello (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Wow, that was unexpected. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: talk page

hey man, saw that you posted on my talk page some time ago. sorry to leave you hangin for the last few months, but i've come to realize that wikipedia really isn't the place for casual, time-strapped editors like me, so for all intents and purposes, i've disconnected my keyboard, metaphorically speaking. saw the noticeboard thing today and tried to give some perspective. i know you're fighting the good fight, but just be patient with the admins, and hopefully they'll start to see the logic in what you're saying. i think walking them through one good edit war may very well be enough. for what it's worth, in the end...truth alone triumphs...good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.115.152 (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Now, I know, how was that user's name again? Marcus Maximus? Do you have the link to the account. Of course, Nero and Marcus Maximus, both Roman emperors. JCAla (talk) 09:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

It was Nangparbat[8] Already mentioned him on the SPI for Mar4d Darkness Shines (talk) 09:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

1RR

Aren't you under 1RR restriction? You have gone too far at Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir. Is the other user confirmed sock? --SMS ^Talk 18:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

• He admitted he was ya, see the sockpuppet investigation page. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

No I never admitted to be nangaprabat......Barrot0114 (talk) 18:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Ya you did, [9] Darkness Shines (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Please don't retaliate

I know it's frustrating, but comments like "Your a jerk" are not acceptable, even if you are provoked - please stay cool and follow the appropriate procedures -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

This is the fourth time he has targeted me, he is a jerk, especially as I had offered to support his unblock appeal. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeating your personal attacks on another editor. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

You were warned, and you did it again -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You have got to be joking? I am constantly targeted by this sock and I get a block for saying he is a jerk? Darkness Shines (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

As per agreement below -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Calling someone a jerk and a moron on their Talk page really isn't acceptable. I understand you were provoked, which is why I only gave you a friendly warning (while at the same time I gave the other editor an indef block). But you continued to call the other editor a jerk in response to my warning, which is only going to make things worse. If you agree to stop hurling insults around like this I'll be happy to lift the block myself -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Well he's blocked now so I'm not about to hurl anything bar my cup of coffee. Agree to no more insult hurling. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Done - but don't waste good coffee! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, your right BTW I should not react to him, but being targeted on a regular basis is annoying. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Reply

Thanks for letting me know. But in this stub form, it probably should be merged with Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir. Who is the puppet master? Has he been banned? I'd also reiterate my earlier request for you to remain civil and polite even and especially in the face of provocation. AshLin (talk) 03:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

The master was Nangparbat He has been giving me a lot of trouble for months using socks and IP's. The article is a stub, at the moment. This time tomorrow it will be considerably expanded. I noted your comments on your talk page about Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir article, I fully agree with you. I am also rewriting that one is my sandbox. Darkness Shines (talk) 03:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Northern Ireland

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Northern Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Inter-Services Intelligence support for terrorism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inter-Services Intelligence support for terrorism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter-Services Intelligence support for terrorism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SMS ^Talk 18:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

The Joint Signal Intelligence Bureau(JSIB) provide support with communications to groups in Kashmir.

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for an IBAN violation, as you did at User talk:Magog the Ogre. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Sorry? Were exactly have I mentioned the person with whom I have the IBAN? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Magog_the_Ogre&diff=481718124&oldid=481715817] And this is not an IBAN violation, I am allowed to ask about such things if I think there is a violation going on, communicating and coordinating off wiki to get others to do your work is a violation. It was OK for an SPI to get filed against me? Am I not allowed to also ask a question regarding suspicious behavior?[[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines#top|talk]]) 19:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)}}

Why did you bring him back into this story? I knew it would end like this. JCAla (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Because he deleted the sock article, I asked him if it would be OK to redo it and he said yes, I asked him if the restoring of it to user space would become an issue, he said no. It of course did become an issue and now that I have asked about it he has blocked me. Sal said asking about this was not a violation. I never even mentioned any names when I inquired about off wiki communication being used which has to be a violation. Magog obviously has something against me, he has blocked me every time at the drop of a hat. His first block of me was for doing one revert for fucks sake, he is just block happy. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps magog being too busy did not looked too deeply into the gravity of situation as othersstricking my comment as it wasnt not intended to offend magog---- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 21:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

From WP:IBAN: exceptions include "asking an administrator to take action against a violation of an interaction ban by the other party (but normally not more than once), asking for necessary clarifications about the scope of the ban, or appealing the ban for a good reason." Making a snide remark implying meatpuppetry directly at the other editor ("I am... disappointed in you"[10]) and in no way asking for administrator for help or filing a request asking for possible action is not in any way "legitimate and necessary dispute resolution" concerning the ban itself. It is an escalation of the tit-for-tat war words that was going on before and that this ban was precisely crafted to avoid. If you are honest with yourself, I think you will see it (and please, let's discuss your behavior, not mine, WP:NOTTHEM and all). Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

(ec)Well thank you for at least once responding. I had to do it the way I did, otherwise it would have been a violation. If I wrote "I believe there are off wiki communications between Mar4D SMS & TG" you would have blocked me for saying TG. I just pointed you to the thread in question with no mention of names to draw your attention to the fact that I am certain there is off wiki communication ongoing, this was evident from the SPI which was filed. I have done my very best to avoid naming names or interacting, it is not that bloody easy to try and get across a concern about something without breaking the IBAN. I was doing my best not to. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

And yes, I know this is my fault for not being clear enough, I am not trying to blame anyone else for this. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Simply not mentioning TopGun's name doesn't mean it's not an interaction ban violation. Neither does mentioning his name necessarily make it a violation. That is a wikilawyer way of looking at things. It's the sentiment behind the statement. If you had come to my talkpage and said "I think TopGun is violating the interaction ban, this is why I think it; could you take action?" or filed a sockpuppet report with TopGun's name, it would not have been a violation because it would have been done in a good-faith effort to deal with the problem. But making a comment directly at him and implying that maybe there was an interaction ban isn't in any way trying to get the problem fixed. That's the difference. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok I get that, I was not trying to be a sea-lawyer. I basically did it the wrong way, fair enough. But you must realize I have been walking on eggshells over here, anything which may have looked like a violation was instantly reported. The proof of that is on yours & Sal's talk pages. I was trying to be careful and fucked it up. All I can say is sorry next time I will be straightforward. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

A prime example, I removed a copyright violation, all TG had done was use the Reflinks tool on the article, that was reported as am IBAN violation. That is why I commented out content instead of removing it on the restored article, and that was again reported as a violation. Like I said, I have been walking on eggshells. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Given what was just posted on your talk page see here. Like I said, every possible move I make is reported as a fucking violation, usually out of context. And why is my talk page on his watchlist? Just tell me what is not a violation as regardless of what I do it gets fucking reported as one, so life would be a little easier, as at the moment whatever I fucking do gets reported as a bloody vio. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Probable sock

User:Najamkhan16 probable sock of User :Wikiwriter786 IP 200.98.197.34 is posting from Brazil, SA, doubt it is a sock. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Lol the ISI get caught again [11] How crap are they? Darkness Shines (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Did not expect this. User:September88 is also User:182.177.22.143 based on geolocation + some common sense, based on this [12] I cannot help but think she logs out to support her cause, both IP's geolcate to the same spot. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

You can't really say that's the ISI, I mean you've done excellent work on anti-vandalism but making such rash statements like this with no logic does not help. (Wiki id2(talk) 17:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC))

In this you are in fact incorrect, I know how to ping an IP. It is even easier when it is a static one as used by most government institutions, Darkness Shines (talk) 17:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

... in good ol'Punjab. Are you sure enough to file a SPI? JCAla (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Positive, no doubt at all. Static IP's are piss easy to backtrack Darkness Shines (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

User:182.177.22.143 is Rawalpindi (ISI HQ) and I am trying really trying to refrain from commenting on that any further. User:39.47.36.30 is Mohra Nur, Islamabad neighborhood. But how do you know it's September88? JCAla (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Because I am very very good, and this of course [13] [14] Busted springs to mind. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I filed an SPI based on your research. JCAla (talk) 19:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Good one, I'll get he others soon enough as well. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

No no and no

[15] Can someone ask Ashlin to pop over so I my tell him why this is terrible. Sources, no good, use western academic sources only, any fro mthe region will be seen as biased. I have sources for what you have written, just ask should you need some or some research done. No internal to ISI, so any random reader will think "who"? You name names from your sources, who are they? What makes their opinions notable? More research and better sourcing my friend. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your talk page is open for one purpose only: to contest your block. Please stop abusing this privilege. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I assumed I could post anything on here? Had not realized I was breaking a rule. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Not only that, but, as TopGun has correctly informed me, you've once again gone and broken another IBAN violation. I was considering unblocking you based on your own recognition of your faults. Please do not make any more comments directed at TopGun, about TopGun, or anything to do with TopGun unless you are specifically asking an administrator (through a formal or informal process) to address what you perceive to be a violation of IBAN on his part. No making sly comments toward him without using his name. No making comments about him without using his name. No talking about his mother or his father or anything he said for the past 15 years. That's it. It's that simple. Stop trying to get around that rule, and you will stop getting blocked.

FYI, you are this >< close to getting indefinitely blocked. And no, I don't care what the enforcement is on anyone else; we're talking about your behavior and you alone. Please take the next 48 hours to consider your behavior. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)