Darkchun
Welcome!
Hello, Darkchun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 06:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
The article you created on Ben Underwood is being proposed for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Underwood. Since the referenced information is already in human echolocation, it has been suggested that it be redirected to that article, but you may like to give your opinion at the AFD discussion before this takes place (either to support or object to the idea). Cheers, Yomanganitalk 11:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Avril + AVRiL edit
From what I can tell, you are the person who wrote "[Avril Lavigne] has a weapon named after her in UT2004 called the AVRiL." I don't think this is correct. I found your name by searching through the history of the Avril Lavigne page. I just want that statement removed (it's locked from unregistered users). That's it. 70.69.206.62 03:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Proper
revert war on Talk: Paris Hilton edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Paris Hilton. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. As of this notice, you have reverted four times. Dreaded Walrus t c 21:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I was just going to leave you a message about this too. In my opinion, all 3 revert rule silliness aside, the problem is simple: "inside" information from some anonymous poster's friend's brother is about as far from a reliable source as you can get. This stuff doesn't belong on a talk page, so please stop putting it back. Friday (talk) 21:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kipi, by MER-C (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kipi seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kipi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jay Sher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. βcommand 15:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Sher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Sher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Darkchun. See my response at User talk:EdJohnston#Takahashi Meijin. EdJohnston (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The article Kevin Du has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Long unreferenced BLP of non-notable Hockey player
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Du is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Du until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 19:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)