Lianne Morgan (born 15 november 1970)in Cardiff,Wales was one of the aspiring to become one of the spice girls.She auditioned back in 1994 for then called Touch band singing few bars from a Motown song and was picked initially alongside Michelle Stephenson, Melanie B, Victoria Adams and Geri Halliwell but after 2 months she received a letter where she was told she can't fit with the others, so she was replaced by Melanie C. She sang in her own band called "Lee Lah" and also organising events. She opened "Stagecamp" in 2002, a school for teenagers to become famous and also worked hard to establish herself as a solo singer. She is no longer involved with Stagecamp and as of 2007 is settled in Cardiff as a full time mum with two children. She sang in a german act called Kim Ono with a song, a cameo after Alphaville called "Big in Japan" with a medium succes in mid 90's. In december she signed a contract with a management and she will comeback on stage in 2008. ==External Link== www.liannemorgan.co.uk

Notability of :Lianne Morgan

edit
 

A tag has been placed on :Lianne Morgan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 13:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Lianne morgan1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Leemorgan2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Notability of Abigail Kis

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Abigail Kis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Abigail Kis seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Abigail Kis, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means, and on Notability (music) for more detail. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are deleted. To find out more about creating articles, read the introduction, tutorial, and the guide to creating your first article. JohnCD (talk) 14:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Suzanne Tinker

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Suzanne Tinker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 14:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Suzanne Tinker

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Suzanne Tinker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Suzanne Tinker. J Milburn (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Abigail Kis

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Abigail Kis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Abigail Kis. J Milburn (talk) 14:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Abigail Kis

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Abigail Kis, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Kis. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lianne Morgan

edit

Hi. This is just a quick note to save you wasting your time on the Lianne Morgan article. There was a detailed discussion and a decision was taken that the article was not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lianne Morgan. It was changed into a redirect and, unless Morgan becomes much more famous than she currently is, it will stay that way. Please do not change the redirect. It could lead to the whole thing getting deleted permanently. --DanielRigal (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Lianne Morgan" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Lianne Morgan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 18 § Lianne Morgan until a consensus is reached. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply