October 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hutch Dano have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU () 00:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hutch Dano. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hutch Dano was changed by Danosgallery (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953003 on 2016-10-24T00:54:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:54, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

HELP! I am Hutch Dano's Personal assistant. We are monitoring his wiki page to ensure that incorrect information is corrected. I have made several small edits but received the above edits. I have included sources and still have had my edits reverted. Can you please advise? Danosgallery (talk) 01:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hutch Dano. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC) Reply

HELP! I'm not trying to vandalize or post things that are not allowed simply trying to cite sources. I am actually Hutch Dano's real life friend and sometimes PA and we are simply trying to make sure that the info is correct and up to date. I value any assistant. I previously posted and edited as Abstract Elephant but lost my log info. It's frustrating when people have come along and post non verifiable information but i can't correct it even with links verify and cite my sources from legitimate news sources. @Amaury: can you please help Danosgallery (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

First, see WP:COI and WP:PAID and, second, mass-removing the contents simply because of something said or how it should be "temporarily removed" is not convincing and is not how Wikipedia functions, especially because (regardless of anything) the information was in fact sourced. Also, articles cannot be solely be controlled by the subject himself as if it were his own personal website. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Danosgallery, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Danosgallery! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016 edit

 
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Danosgallery, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply