Peer Review
editA) You don't have complete 350 words, so I suggest that you focus on expanding the topic with the proper word count in a fair and unbiased way in order to complete the criteria.
B) I think you are focused on the topic because you have included all the aspects of police corruption and nothing otherwise was said, such as biased opinions.
C) The view point was fair because it states what happens in the police department without your bias and nothing OUT OF THE BOX was said.
D) Reference sources are okay and are reliable sources.
E) So far it doesn’t include original research and just states commonly known facts.
F) So far I don’t see any mechanical errors with any of the edits, looks like you are going to fix the pages errors which is good.
G) Not much has been edited to the main page but from what it looks like you are going to do from the suggestion on the talk page it seems that you will have organized sections so each section is relevant to the next and it seems you are going to make a better flow to the main article page.
H) Not much has been edited to the main page but from what it looks like you are going to do from the suggestion on the talk page, you should be okay with complying with style guideline for lead sections, layout,etc. Just make sure to link things wiki page to wiki page, if you do add things that have a page.
J) I saw that an image was added but taken down. I thought the caption was okay for the image and relevant to the topic. Looks like image was taken down because it wasn't tagged properly with copyright status so make sure you do that in the future.