Danielyng, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Danielyng! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Trouted edit

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Displaying an icon on your user page that reads "this user is an administrator", which you are not. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 21:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fuller's Coffee Shop GA edit

Hi Daniel, I saw that you were busy, so I reviewed Fuller's Coffee Shop's GA nomination. Hope you don't mind. In my opinion, the article is an easy pass, as I've described on its GA nom page, and you can formally promote it. Cheers, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 13:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI, Thanks! I've pinged on the GA nom page and see User:Armadillopteryx has pinged at Talk:Club Feathers/GA1 as well. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Talk:Naewat-dang shamanic paintings/GA1 edit

 

The page Talk:Naewat-dang shamanic paintings/GA1 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Deleting abandoned review (going on 3 weeks now) to put this back in the pool

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC(talk) 09:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Talk:The Hobbit (2003 video game)/GA1 edit

 

The page Talk:The Hobbit (2003 video game)/GA1 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Deleting abandoned review (going on 3 weeks now) to put this back in the pool

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC(talk) 09:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concluding GA reviews edit

Jurysith, you opened a number of reviews that you later stopped posting to. The assumption is being made that you have abandoned them, and others have done reviews in the interim or the review pages have been deleted outright. For the two that remain, you are still listed (under your prior username) as the reviewer who opened them, and thus are by default the one who is expected to close them.

If you won't be acting further on the reviews, it would be courteous to say so there (Talk:Club Feathers/GA1 and Talk:Fuller's Coffee Shop/GA1). In any event, if we have not heard from you by the end of 2020, we will take it as confirmation that you will not participate further and continue without you. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note: if this post is deleted, it will be taken as a confirmation that you will not be pursuing these reviews any further. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bureaucrat—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Blablubbs|talk 00:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
Click here to opt out of any future messages.

(t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply