User talk:Danhash/Archive 2

Latest comment: 9 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Books and Bytes - Issue 11
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

MarkMonitor

Hi Danhash. In Septmeber 2011 you left a comment on the MarkMonitor article. Since you have demonstrated an interest in the subject (and perhaps are somewhat familiar with it) I wanted to request a moment of your time to review my proposed edits for neutrality. You can see my Talk page comment and disclosure in this string here and the proposed article draft here. King4057 (talk) 06:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks

 
WikiThanks

Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.210 (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking notice! May I ask where you've noticed my edits recently? —danhash (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Special:ActiveUsers cheers, 66.87.0.210 (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Placebo - iTunes Live- London Festival '09.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Placebo - iTunes Live- London Festival '09.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

  Fixed. —danhash (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Live at Angkor Wat

Editing I've made some changes (well, I'm making them now...) and I'd be happy to help you some. If you want a quick look at some higher-quality album articles that I've written or co-written, see Illinois (album), ETHWHT, New Multitudes, and Backspacer. Alternately, just take a look at Category:GA-Class Album articles and Category:FA-Class Album articles. Please post to my talk if you want my help with this or any other issue. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 04:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Good questions I changed the hyphen to an endash per WP:DASH. As that part of the Manual of Style reads, "Two forms of dash are used on Wikipedia"—it doesn't explicitly state if this is only on content or if it applies to sources as well. I know that our MOS trumps the formatting of quotations and it seems reasonable that it would apply to the formatting of sources as well.
As for the cover image, it was named File:791_1326897699_1323968965_placebo_-_live_at_angkor_wat.jpg, whereas it should be given a more simple an intelligible name, like File:Placebo - Live at Angkor Wat.jpg. I actually changed the text of the article before I decided to move the file, thinking that it would be a simple process. It turns out the cover image was uploaded at Wikimedia Commons which is an inappropriate venue for this, so it was deleted from Commons. It needs to be uploaded to Wikipedia only (not the Commons) and then it can be used in the article. If you need help with this, then please let me know. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 17:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Alright that makes sense about the image (I just recently saw the notification on the talk page about the image on commons so figured out that's why it was deleted); I'll try and upload it when I get a chance or you feel free if you want. I guess that makes sense with the dashes, though I wish we had a formal policy. I've seen this discussed before with dashes.js. Thanks. —danhash (talk) 18:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
MOS I posted to WT:MOS and was directed to this: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Allowable_typographical_changes. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 20:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
I continued the discussion you started here: WT:MOS#Does the MoS apply to sources?danhash (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request DanhashBot

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DanhashBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 05:37, 7 April 2012 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

 Y Replied. —danhash (talk) 13:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello!

Go here : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Domaina ! ;) See you next! --2.9.180.167 (talk) 08:30, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!! —danhash (talk) 14:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

An award for you

 
Golden Wiki Award

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.4.17 (talk) 20:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Cinavia Article

Thank you for cleaning it up! I had previously tried only to get my edits undone, I will add it to my watch list and keep an eye on your changes.

Great job! Tyros1972 (talk) 07:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! It's been in terrible shape for a while and I've been wanting to clean it up. There are far too many articles in similar states of disarray which need attention. I encourage you to keep improving it! —danhash (talk) 20:36, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Cinavia

Going over the change-logs for the Cinavia entry, and it appeared as though you removed the known releases containing the water marking. Please undo your edit! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.212.215 (talk) 23:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

<- I have to agree with this user. You're deleting valuable information in the name of tidiness. Also - I have no idea what I'm doing editing this, but I know that you've deleted valuable information from wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.196.136.126 (talkcontribs) 02:32, 23 April 2012
Please see Talk:Cinavia/Archive 1#Article clean up. I do not feel like repeating myself. —danhash (talk) 13:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Digital rights management

I noticed you reverted my edit. No problem with that. I am just wondering what the 'spoiler' on images like this: File:Watermark sample.jpg would be termed as?--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

There are different types of digital watermarks, and the watermarks section of digital rights management is about imperceptible watermarks (steganographically-embedded data that is designed to be and claimed to be imperceptible). The image you provided is an example of a perceptible watermark. While both perceptible and imperceptible watermarks are classified as "digital watermarks", they are separate things with (at least somewhat) separate purposes and uses. Cinavia is an example of an imperceptible watermark; when consumers use the affected media as the copyright holders intended, there is (supposedly) no loss of quality and "legitimate" consumers will supposedly not be affected. While perceptible watermarks may lower the value of media they are added to, the section in question is about imperceptible watermarks, and while imperceptible watermarks arguably lower the value of the media they are added to as well, that is not their purpose in the same sense that "recording the copyright owner", "recording the distributor", "recording the distribution chain", and "identifying the purchaser of the music" are. —danhash (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
I see. Would my image fit as example here: Digital_watermarking#Perceptibility then?--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
While I think a better example of a perceptible watermark could be found, that seems like a legitimate place for an example such as yours. I was was thinking how it'd be good to have an example of an imperceptible watermark as well, but of course that wouldn't make much sense if the watermark was truly imperceptible. Perhaps an audio clip with an imperceptible watermark and spectrum analysis of the audio could be created and added to audio watermark detection. Ideas, ideas. —danhash (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I have done sound editing. If I can find a PD sound file and a freeware program that adds watermarks, I may try a screen shot of the spectra of the sound files before and after.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I just realized that this image of a perceptible watermark (which, to me, seems like a better example) is already used at digital watermarking, but it is not specifically labeled as having a perceptible watermark. Maybe a better caption could be used? —danhash (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
That would be great. What I'd really like is something like this for Cinavia, but it seems like it hasn't been figured out yet. The album Turning Season Within was leaked online before its release with spoken voiceovers (i.e. perceptible watermarks) added; I wonder if a short audio clip of one of the voice overs would be fair use? —danhash (talk) 19:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
I adjusted the caption. I have the unmarked picture of my the sheep. I can add any perceptible watermark to it as well as a sample of imperceptible in the same image. I could include a screenshot of the imperceptible?--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps stacking the three images vertically with {{multiple image}} and using a perceptible watermark that is easily read at thumbnail size? —danhash (talk) 20:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Soladigm Article

I noticed you nominated the Soladigm Article for deletion. It appears, however, that the updates and sources issues have been resolved. Could you please point out what needs to be done to improve the article to remove the proposed deletion? I'm a bit baffled as to why this article was singled out, as I've seen several other Wikipedia articles with much less complete and less notable content but no deletion proposal (examples: Pyron Solar, Sulfurcell, etc.). Thanks in advance for shedding some light on this. Electrochromismexpert (talk) 04:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

I proposed deletion before the issues were fixed. I'm still not sure it's a notable company since the article was hardly updated in 3 years and it took a speedy nom, a prod, and an AfD before anyone added sources. As it stands now, the deletion discussion has my nomination to delete and one keep vote. I am not opposed to the article being kept if more eyes will be on it, but I think it needs to be looked at closely and expanded a bit to be worthy of being kept. Three years with no updates is a long time for a notable company to have such a bad article, so it doesn't seem terribly likely to me that the company is notable unless someone is willing to actually put some work in to demonstrate why it's notable. —danhash (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request DanhashBot

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DanhashBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 17:13, 1 May 2012 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

 Y Replied. —danhash (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Questions about Wikipedia & SuggestBot

Hi, we’ve been running a research experiment with SuggestBot and would like to ask you some questions about Wikipedia and SuggestBot. You can find more information and the questions on this page. It should take less than ten minutes to respond. We would greatly appreciate if you had the time to participate! Regards, Nettrom (talk) 18:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, just stopping by with a one-time reminder that we would really like to hear from you! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 20:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. When you recently edited Skiptrace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Dashes & AutoEd

Dan, you commented here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GregU/dashes.js#AutoEd that you couldn't get Dashes & AutoEd to work together, and said "enabling" is needed on Chrome. I've experienced the same problem, and can't figure out what to do. If, on my vector.js, I put one below the other like this:

importScript("User:GregU/dashes.js");
importScript('Wikipedia:AutoEd/complete.js');
I get the second one working, but not the first. But I can't find anything on my Chrome to do the enabling. Can you help? Thanks. --S. Rich (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Take a look at my common.js (scroll down to "AutoEd modules"). Dashes will run if I run AutoEd in Chrome, but since Dashes is enabled it is the only module that will run. If Dashes finds no changes to make (for example if it has already been run on the page once), then the rest of the AutoEd modules will run just fine in Chrome. So if you'd like to use Dashes and other AutoEd modules in Chrome, you can run AutoEd once, which will run Dashes, save the page, then run AutoEd again which will run the other modules. Let me know if you can't make it work. —danhash (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

User name:Betty Tsai

Dear Danhash, I didn't receive the mail and what kind of reliable resource you need? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betty Tsai (talkcontribs) 07:58, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Please see our policy on reliable sources as well as advertising. Thanks. —danhash (talk) 17:35, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Sayonara Player

Hello Danhash!

On Friday I added Sayonara Player to the list, but after a few hours it was removed again with the reason that there exists no article to it. For Decibel there exists no article either but I am sure, that there will be one in future.

Please reintegrate this entry.

Thanks in advance,

Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.76.156.254 (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

 

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)

Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world.

Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations...

Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...

Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...

Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...

Read Books & Bytes

The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs) 16:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Books & Bytes New Years Double Issue

Books & Bytes

 

Volume 1 Issue 3, December/January 2013

(Sign up for monthly delivery)

Happy New Year, and welcome to a special double issue of Books & Bytes. We've included a retrospective on the changes and progress TWL has seen over the last year, the results of the survey TWL participants completed in December, some of our plans for the future, a second interview with a Wiki Love Libraries coordinator, and more. Here's to 2014 being a year of expansion and innovation for TWL!

The Wikipedia Library completed the first 6 months of its Individual Engagement grant last week. Here's where we are and what we've done:

Increased access to sources: 1500 editors signed up for 3700 free accounts, individually worth over $500,000, with usage increases of 400-600%
Deep networking: Built relationships with Credo, HighBeam, Questia, JSTOR, Cochrane, LexisNexis, EBSCO, New York Times, and OCLC
New pilot projects: Started the Wikipedia Visiting Scholar project to empower university-affiliated Wikipedia researchers
Developed community: Created portal connecting 250 newsletter recipients, 30 library members, 3 volunteer coordinators, and 2 part-time contractors
Tech scoped: Spec'd out a reference tool for linking to full-text sources and established a basis for OAuth integration
Broad outreach: Wrote a feature article for Library Journal's The Digital Shift; presenting at the American Library Association annual meeting
...Read Books & Bytes!

Books & Bytes, Issue 4

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014

 

News for February from your Wikipedia Library.

Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers

Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement

American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia

Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th

Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias

Read the full newsletter


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 5

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 5, March 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

  • New Visiting Scholar positions
  • TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
  • Australian articles get a link to librarians
  • Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 6

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 6, April-May 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

  • New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)
  • TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans
  • TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns
  • New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz gmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 7

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • Seven new donations, two expanded partnerships
  • TWL's Final Report up, read the summary
  • Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators
  • Spotlight: Blog post on BNA's impact on one editor's research

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 8

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status
  • Four new donations, including large DeGruyter parntership, pilot with Elsevier
  • New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more
  • Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter



MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)

Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

  • DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
  • Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
  • Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
  • British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
  • Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
  • Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
  • JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (December 2014)

Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Mass Message tool to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

Books and Bytes - Issue 9

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
  • New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
  • Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Wikipedia Library and Persian Wikipedia" - a Persian Wikipedia editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

PC reviewer

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Books and Bytes - Issue 10

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
  • New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
  • TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
  • New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
  • Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter



MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)