This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Verdict as established by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely.


Banned edit

As an abusive sockpuppet of a permanently banned user, you aren't welcome here. All of your edits have been reverted. Go away. --Yamla 15:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Damon88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not had any problem except with the users Paulley and Yamla

Decline reason:

Can't see that as a reason to unblock. Abusive sockpuppetry is prohibited. --pgk 19:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note that this is a confirmed abusive sockpuppet of a permanently banned user. Please strongly consider not unblocking this vandal. --Yamla 17:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Damon88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That guy is just full of it. I am not who he claims I am. I didn´t recieve a single warning to get blocked by anyone, and I didn´t vandalise anything. Now I´ve waited a long time.

Decline reason:

Despite your lovely argument that Yamla is "full of it", I'm keeping the block in place. Warnings aren't necessary for sockpuppets of banned users, which you clearly are. — Kafziel Talk 13:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Damon88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

please unblock me:):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):)

Decline reason:

I'd rather not... :(:(:(:(:(:(:(:( — Alex Muller 17:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.