April 2016

edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bosco Chocolate Syrup. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Twice added info that was not in the sources cited, then used prior wikipedia ref as source, in violation of WP:Circular NotaBene Talk 21:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bosco Chocolate Syrup, you may be blocked from editing. Repeated (three times) adding unsubstantiated WP:OR see WP:NOTRELIABLE and WP:SELFPUBLISH NotaBene Talk 12:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Bosco Chocolate Syrup. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NotaBene 鹰百利 Talk 23:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DaleMClayton. Thank you. NotaBene 鹰百利 Talk 23:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply