Daddygotem

Welcome!

Hello, Daddygotem!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 20:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Order (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StartOkayStop was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Search For Order and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StartOkayStop (talk) 02:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Daddygotem! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StartOkayStop (talk) 02:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Order (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Search For Order and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks for your feedback. Could you explain some of this rationale a little more?

In particular: Why won't a quote from the publisher's website do? Is there a better way to communicate how experts in the field responded to the book? I guess I don't see what the issue is. Would you rather I only say that specific historians felt good or enjoyed the book and then put a reference to the page where their quotes can be found? In a nutshell: is the issue that I used a direct quote or something else? The specific quotes I used I felt were indicative of the larger reception that the book has had in the academic world.

I also believe the photo of the book has been removed, will I need to take my own photo of the book that I own to upload it instead?

Thank you! Daddygotem (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Still hoping to receive a response and more information regarding this decision. thank you Daddygotem (talk) 14:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

17 August 2022

Your edit to Silencing The Past has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.  Spintendo  12:39, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Hey! Are you able to provide more specific examples or information about exactly what is copyrighted that I used and what needs to be improved?

I am new to this and would love as much information as possible about how to better improve my editing skills for the future.

Thank you! Daddygotem (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Order (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Search For Order and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Can you please provide more concrete feedback regarding my submission? It is incredibly frustrating to receive a single sentence with what feels like little to no effort in attempting to actually assist in how to meet the standards required for publishing.

I've yet to receive a response regarding the previous rejection, and I'm not entirely sure what exactly is lacking here. Is it simply that I don't have enough references? Or is it the quality of the references? Or is it something more? Do I need to find every single reference of the book in any published academic journal, or just one to meet the criteria? Is there an established, required criteria, or is it more dependent on each individual reviewer's expectations?

Can you please provide a more thorough reasoning behind your decision here so that I can actually improve my abilities and meet the necessary criteria more easily? Daddygotem (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Order has been accepted

The Search For Order, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 03:54, 22 August 2022 (UTC)