Reply edit
Hi and thanks for your message on my talk page. And no need to apologise, definitely an ok thing to do (the other way would be to discuss this on the article's talk page). Thanks for removing the phrase "best criticism" - that is "point of view" language (i.e. who says it is the 'best'?) which is not ok on wikipedia. I have edited it again to remove the external link (see WP:EL). If someone has a wikipedia page then you can link to that then that may establish them as a notable viewpoint to be included, but without that I think the question would remain why is Forman's view worth including over any other? I'm not saying it isn't, just that perhaps a brief comment justifying it is worthwhile would be helpful, e.g. do other reliable sources call him an expert on the topic? I hope that makes sense, please feel free to reply here if not! Cheers, Melcous (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)