User talk:DJames5/Job Satisfaction Equity Theory

Peer Review

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Date of review 05/06/2013

Name of editor: DJames5 URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013 Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit

Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free

Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Name of student reviewer **	Wikipedia User: Aaleksanian
Date of review	5/5/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: DJames5
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/5/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/5/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	The information provided was matching to a topic from textbook.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Information accurate
Wikiformatting	Nice formatting
Grammar & composition	Well done
Other comments	Might want to add some more info for more credit.

Peer Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor: Dexter James DJames5

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory#Equity_Theory

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/2/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 5/1/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): 3 sentences

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: bullets, list form

Grammar & composition: Perfect grammar and composition

Other comments: very short

--Christina geo (talk) 20:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Name of student reviewer **	Wikipedia User: M.Caban
Date of review	5/3/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: DJames5
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory#Equity_Theory
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/3/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/3/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	The information provided was accurate from textbook
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	The information was accurate
Wikiformatting	Good on number list
Grammar & composition	No spelling errors or grammar found
Other comments	Excellent edit. On the second sentence "these" the "t" needs to be capital, "These". Pointer, you stated "Other psychologist". If you can state which types it would help or leave it as psychologist in general and maybe take "Other" out.