I Yandexed those and more can be easily found. These are a grab bag of rather random links, but even with them much can be done. Sorry that I haven't done it myself. Please also use my version before my revert, whatever little useful (if anything) you find there. Also, if you enter the Ukrainian name in the Yandex search string, you will find many links too, as my experience tells me with other Kiev places. Good luck and I hope I will join you with this soon. --Irpen 05:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- http://dem.globaltechnology.ru/Kiev_andrew.htm I wrote to author asking for permission to use pics
- http://www.froster.com.ua/forum/lofiversion/index.php/www.vcrusade.com/t8675.html
- http://mainroad.org.ua/site.php/page828.html
- http://zs.com.ua/journal/archive/september/legendy_i_byli_kievs_83.html
- http://www.hotels-kiev.com/rus/andreevsky_spusk.htm
- http://www.vozdvyzhensky.com/frame_pages/guide_rus.htm
- http://www.ukraineforyou.com/culture_one.aspx?lang=1&id=248
- http://hedgymot.kiev.ua/kiev/?place=11
- http://guide.kyiv.ru/ru/city/streets/2005/10/20/107.html
- http://zamkovagora.kiev.ua/content/index.php?cmd=4&cmd_sub=0&id=133
Dima, I think you should merge whatever version you have here to the current version of the article at the Andrew's Descent because people are editing that article. DYK is secondary to the possibility of the lost work. there will be plenty of others. On the brighter side, the author of *http://dem.globaltechnology.ru/Kiev_andrew.htm site responded to my email and she agrees to using her images under GFDL license. If you get to uploading her images before I get to them, just let me know and I will supply the aknowledgement the author requested. Sorry, too little time right now but I will get to all this later. --Irpen 23:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I merged the version here, with your version, and the Andrew's Descent version. Should I replace the version here with the Andrew's Descent article? --DDima 00:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
I am not sure what you mean. I think what should be done, is that the work should be continued under the article's permanent location, rather than the user space. My idea of the articles in the userspace is to avoid posting them prematurely, but save the current version. Since the article is already posted anyway, why not work at it at the permanent location? Cheers, --Irpen 01:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)