User talk:Cyclonenim/Archive May09

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.


GA Sweeps invitation edit

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 08:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009 edit

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vitiligo edit

Hey, since the Summer is nearly upon us, would you like to start working on this soon. Say towards the end of May? —R2 14:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you can make it... edit

...then you might be interested in this - there's quite a few people going. Cheers,WilliamH (talk) 17:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009 edit

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

ThankSpam edit

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton andLar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record.
I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received -but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

~~~~~

Well, back to the office it is...

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009 edit

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply