User talk:Cyclonenim/Archive Jan10

Latest comment: 14 years ago by WereSpielChequers in topic RFA

Dermatology-related content progress edit

Thanks again for your help in the past with the dermatology-related content on Wikipedia. We have continued to make significant progress with the Bolognia push. Also, the most recent project popular page statistics are out, and the list of cutaneous conditions continues to rise, now #49, up from #65 last month. Thanks again for your support! ---kilbad (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Service awards proposal edit

  Hello, Cyclonenim/Archive Jan10! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've responded to your comments.. edit

..and attempted to explain my position at RMHED's talk page. Cheers. Wisdom89 (T / C) 17:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Cyclonenim. You have new messages at Nancy's talk page.
Message added 19:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Nancy talk 19:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

RFA edit

Hi, if you don't think you could pass then the system is more broken than I thought - mind you I supported you last April. I would hope that even if only 6 people get through RFA in February you could be one of them, and if you ever do agree to stand I'd be honoured to nominate you. You have been active since 2006, and one of the reasons why I believe RFA to be broken is that you and editors like you didn't become admins long ago. ϢereSpielChequers 16:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply