Cuongphantwg

April 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Bollard. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] Apparition^{11 Talk}/Contribs 23:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

How do you consider the link is inappropriate? Do you have enough literacy to read the content? Cuongphantwg (talk) 00:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Feel free to use your superior literacy to read WP:ELNO and WP:RS. Apparition^{11 Talk}/Contribs 01:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

1. This guideline does not apply to inline citations or general references, which should appear in the "References" or "Notes" section. This specifically includes e-commerce and other commercial-sales links, which are prohibited in External links but allowed in footnoted citations.

Cuongphantwg (talk) 01:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

That guideline would apply to the first time that you spammed that site as an IP. Apparition^{11 Talk}/Contribs 01:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

So.. ? What do you try to imply here? Cuongphantwg (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

It is not a reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is obvious that you are here to promote that site. Wikipedia is not an avenue for promotion. Apparition^{11 Talk}/Contribs 01:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

When you judge on "reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" Would you consider to these links on the page are reliable when they are not even accessible?

https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/404

https://www.mhi.org/fundamentals/material-handling

https://people.engr.ncsu.edu/kay/Material_Handling_Equipment.pdf

https://people.engr.ncsu.edu/kay/Warehousing.pdf Cuongphantwg (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Dead links can be repaired, see WP:DEADREF. Regardless, even if they were inappropriate, that would be a reason to replace with appropriate refs, not add more inappropriate ones. Apparition^{11 Talk}/Contribs 02:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

@Cuongphantwg, please do not make personal attacks against other editors. One of Wikipedia's core policies is civility. Thanks! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 01:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Cuongphantwg!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 01:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circa Marine (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Circa Marine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Cuongphantwg! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)