Cukci-cmc
May 2022 edit
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Hugo de Burgh. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Amigao,
- Appreciate you point out the issue of poorly referenced information, I shall work on it.
- However his biography you used are out of date and some of them could misleading, that is why I update it.
- If you could not change it back to the old version, I will really appreciate it. Cukci-cmc (talk) 17:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
August 2022 edit
Hello Cukci-cmc. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Hugo de Burgh, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cukci-cmc. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cukci-cmc|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Amigao (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
February 2023 edit
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Hugo de Burgh, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Cukci-cmc, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cukci-cmc|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Amigao (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
March 2023 edit
You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- To respond to your previous question, I don't have any financial stake. I am just updating my colleague's profile on his behalf. Cukci-cmc (talk) 09:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- The information provided was not accurate and not up to date. And the references you added was also not right. Cukci-cmc (talk) 09:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
June 2023 edit
The version you used contains private information, e.g. date of birth. Why it needs to be published? Cukci-cmc (talk) 09:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)