Tags

edit

In general Wiki-tags should not be unilaterally removed while discussions take place. History2007 (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I may also be an older member of Wikipedia than what you think. Explain, therefore, the reason for having added this tag when more than enough discussion had already taken place about that regard (and with you), and as a matter of fact the point of being complaint with wikipedia standards had already been reached... months ago.
The discussion about this regard is part of the Talk page of the article. not user talk.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctmv (talkcontribs) 19:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

jULY 2018

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018 II

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:MjolnirPants. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please note that templating someone back after you have been templated may be considered disruptive editing. Also, restoring a template on another editor’s talk page after they have deleted it may be considered vandalism. I suggest you return to the article talk page and attempt to gain consensus for your desired additions, or use another accepted method of dispute resolution. O3000 (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Help needed at Trinity. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 21:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Topic banned from Christianity, broadly construed

edit

Per the discussion on the Administrators' noticeboard, you are now indefinitely topic-banned from Christianity, broadly construed. This means you must not make any edits on any page on Wikipedia (including articles, talk pages, and any other discussion pages) about Christianity or subjects related to it. If you do, the topic ban will need to be enforced by blocks. If you have any questions on what a topic ban entails, please let me know. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:41, 19 July 2018 (UTC)Reply