Crownbiean12x
Message edit
Hello,i start wrote the history of slavery in spain didn't vandalism any things i just wrote the history with sources i hope everyone accept it and if there's any mistake help me with fixed but don't delete it:)
. Crownbiean12x (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Slavery in Spain, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have been asked to discuss this edit on the article's talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Yes, I do not know much about the Wikipedia system, but why was my article removed? Crownbiean12x (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- It was removed for the reason given in the reverting edit summaries: tone, content, removal of well-referenced material, and more generally the implementation of major changes without achieving prior consensus. Agricolae (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I did not understand what is the reverse editorial summaries ??? and how to achieve prior consensus Crownbiean12x (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- For edit summaries, go to the page, click on the 'history' tab, look at the description of each edit, which will end with the edit summary provided by the editor - in your case, "i wrote the article again pleasse don't delete it", an example of one of the reverting edits: "Please don't remove existing well-referenced content, the tone of the rewrite is very flippant; discuss on talk".
- As to how to achieve prior consensus, you go to the article's Talk page and explain what you intend to do. Anyone interested, or having a concern, will respond. If you get no response after sufficient time has passed (say, a week) then you can go ahead. If concerns are raised, then the disagreement should be worked out there before making the change to the article. While editors are free to be bold and make small initial changes without prior discussion, once that change is reverted they are expected to open a discussion rather than repeating the change, or making changes of the same type. When doing a total rewrite to a page that has a history of recent edits, as is the case for this page, then one should definitely Talk about it first. Agricolae (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Agricolae has explained the situation well. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse but meanwhile edit warring is not permitted. Instead, post on article talk to explain why the article should be changed and why the proposed edits are an improvement. Johnuniq (talk) 04:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Following up on User:Johnuniq, there is another important issue here that needs to be resolved first - it would be a waste of everyone's time to pursue a discussion over your desired changes if they are illegitimate from the start. You restored much of the same text that had previously been added to the article by blocked User:Historyxqs12, and you used a similar edit summary claiming authorship. Likewise, you began this Talk page with a preemptive defense of your edit that refers to to the reason that User:Historyxqs12 was blocked. This gives every appearance of you being the same editor as blocked User:Historyxqs12. It is prohibited for an editor who has been blocked to simply create a new account in order to pursue the same edits, and is sufficient grounds for the new account to also be blocked and all their changes reversed, independent of the quality of the contributions being made. If you are truly a different human, then you need to explain why your edits look so similar. If you are the same as User:Historyxqs12 then you need to stop using this account at once, go back to User:Historyxqs12 (or earlier if there were others) and work on rehabilitating your first account. Agricolae (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
My first account has been banned for sabotage, but how can I rehabilitate it?or exlpain the similar Crownbiean12x (talk) 08:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Each person is allowed one account at Wikipedia. Attempts to use more than that (with certain exceptions that do not apply here) are regarded as WP:Sockpuppetry. You should log of as Crownbiean12x and log on as Historyxqs12 (talk · contribs). Then take the advice at User talk:Historyxqs12 to request an unblock. You would need to work out why someone might have thought your edits were vandalism. Johnuniq (talk) 09:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Can i wrote the article again? Crownbiean12x (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- You cannot do anything on Wikipedia until you sort out your account status. This Crownbiean12x account is invalid - if you continue to use it, it will be permanently disabled. You can only use the Historyxqs12 (talk · contribs) account, and that account is currently blocked due to an accusation of vandalism. This means that you cannot edit articles until that situation is resolved, until that block is removed. On that Historyxqs12 Talk page as part of the block notification is a link that explains how to appeal a block. You need to follow that link and follow the instructions. Only when/if the block is removed from Historyxqs12 (talk · contribs) can you go back to editing pages. Agricolae (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)