User talk:Crossroads/2020, 1st quarter

Personal attack against you on Talk:TERF

For your information, I have warned editor Oldperson regarding his personal attack in the "Unjustified revert" discussion ("...your comment above is simply your own opinion, which quite apparently is strongly anti trans POV.") Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 06:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

I appreciate that. Thank you. -Crossroads- (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

RE: your talk page message you sent me

Thank you for letting me know. I'll read it when I can. Sometimes I feel quite fiery and make radical changes, I'm sorry for disturbance. I get angry often. 95.145.158.20 (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

I had taken this IP to ANI for their persistent adding of custom problem tags, but nothing ever came of it. [1] Crossroads ^-talk- 18:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Please do not spam people's talk pages based on personal disputes you have with other users.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Nikah mut'ah. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. t. AntiRacistSwede (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Obviously retaliatory for this, which was quite deserved for this comment: I'm gonna be honest, it looks like you are hysterical and schizophrenic over this. I for one agree with his analysis of all the sources. So you agree or disagree cause it looks like you are just vandalizing this article for no reason, at the very least you could have attempted to verify some of those sources, which it looks like you had over a few weeks to do, but never attempted to do any such thing —t. Crossroads ^-talk- 22:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

You have not stated what sources you disagree with in Nikah Mutah

You've been WP:Edit warring in Nikah mut'ah, yet when other users have come to a conclusion, you have refused to put your input, and simply are edit warring for the sake of vandalism without stating what exactly you disagree with. 2 of the sources have already been removed, but the 3rd one was explained after further reading of it on p.326, instead you've resorted to ad-hominems -.t AntiRacistSwede (talk) 00:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

User is now blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry. Would have been a waste of time to argue with them about their OR and POV pushing. Crossroads ^-talk- 19:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Dispute resolution

I asked for help in resolving our disagreements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Gender_dysphoria   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 07:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Okay, but the discussion had not reached an impasse yet as far as I could tell. Crossroads ^-talk- 07:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the reading material. The thrust of it was largely as I had already summised, but it added a lot of depth and background to what I had guessed. I will tread cautiously, of course. — Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome; hope it helps. Crossroads ^-talk- 19:54, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the reverted edit on Arecibo Message

I was not aware of WP:FRINGE. And yes the source I stated was not reliable. I have seen many views that oppose the answer as a hoax but those were blogs and I did not feel they would be adequate. I have read up on sources and other information now. You are correct.--SneaselxLv94 (talk) 04:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome. Learning and going by reliable sources like this is commendable. Crossroads ^-talk- 04:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

WARNING!

On March 19, 2020 in the article "Pegging" You fulfiled undid revision on undid revision without any discussion. Don't you know that it's prohibited by Wiki' rules? - 91.193.176.230 (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

No such rule. You added a globalize tag that makes no sense, since there is no evidence there are any non-Western sources, and you logged out to edit war it back and to attack me here, likely so it wouldn't show up on your account contribs. [2][3] See WP:LOUTSOCK. Crossroads ^-talk- 22:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

• I must say that I have a dynamic IP. Okay, I'll go to "Wikipedia: Administrators's noticeboard/Incidents", because you slander on me. - 83.220.236.8 (talk) 23:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Deprodding of List of discoveries in anthropology

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from List of discoveries in anthropology, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! — Chugunkin (talk) 15:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Okay, taken to AfD then. Crossroads ^-talk- 21:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Deprodding of List of discoveries of writings

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from List of discoveries of writings, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! — Chugunkin (talk) 10:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Really? Come on, there is zero chance that the sock's other article - which you de-prodded above - is going to be kept at this point. Why waste our time when it is obvious these will be deleted one way or another? Anyway, here is the AfD for this article. Crossroads ^-talk- 14:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

User Crossroads, I’d like to say that it is necessary to discuss the article – the text – but not the author of the article (as you do it). — Chugunkin (talk) 15:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

It's not necessary, as it does indeed qualify for G5. Crossroads ^-talk- 16:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)