Hamm Court

edit

A tag has been placed on Hamm Court, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 20:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

{{hangon}} I'm creating the page now.

Please don't use the hangon template on your talk page - it's meant for the article. Hut 8.5 20:29, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Software Portfolio Rationalization, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rcsprinter (tell me stuff) @ 17:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Software Portfolio Rationalization

edit
 

The article Software Portfolio Rationalization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Written like an essay, contains a lot of WP:OR. Not encyclopedic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegoKontribsTalkM 02:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Software Portfolio Rationalization for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Software Portfolio Rationalization is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software Portfolio Rationalization until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply