User talk:Crboyer/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Crboyer/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 00:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Not Vandalism

Yeah, go ahead and restore it. --Zpb52 04:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I just want to see burt reynolds on ghostbusters 2016 film sorry i would love to be in the film as myself by using my videos on YouTube from Rod Rod Westheider productions (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

You don't understand how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia reports the facts as is, not what someone wants to be facts.Crboyer (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Page protection

Only admins can protect pages. Putting the template at the top of a page does nothing. If you want a page protected, make a request at Requests for Page Protection, which I am about to do for the Directors Guild of America Awards article.--Dycedarg ж 06:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanx

Thanx for reverting the edits on the michael Jackson article, clearly that person never read the article but just saw the heading. Yours from the depth of enlightenmentRealist2 20:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I have just looked at the users edit history he has done this before so obviously it was deliberate. [[1]] Yours from the depth of enlightenmentRealist2 20:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello

The format I was using for the IMDb link was given to me by another editor who said it was the new way to enter the link. I never checked to see if it was working properly. I appreciate your making the corrections you did. However, may I suggest if in the future you discover someone is repeatedly using an incorrect format that you contact the individual directly and let him or her know instead of making the changes and hoping or assuming he or she eventually will realize what's wrong? Thanks! LiteraryMaven (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Crboyer. You have new messages at Debresser's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Golden Globes - The Hurt Locker

Thank's for your attention! I misinterpreted some news about the CRITICS' CHOICE AWARDS. --Kai-Hendrik (talk) 23:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I only called it vandalism because I'm so used to reverting false info all the time. No hard feelings.

RFPP

Replied at your request. Connormah (talk) 06:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Crboyer. You have new messages at Lukep913's talk page.
Message added 19:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Luke (Talk) 19:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Jonathan Frid - conflicting sources

I had added the entry based on the article, but even within the article, there are RSes that indicate either the 14th or the 13th. What should take precedence? MSJapan (talk) 00:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	reconosco que me equivoque y pido pedon pero esque mi suño es ser famosa se que no es la mejor manera de lograrlo pero ayudeme porfabor y le estare agradecida toda mi vida porfabor y yo ablo español no ingles Kami arenas escobar (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Dude..

Seriously? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snmcfadden (talk • contribs) 06:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Seriously. Adding jokes like that is not constructive.Crboyer (talk) 06:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I was wondering where could I leave messages to you (Crboyer). And really, you've got to admit that last one from ricky gervais's as a polar bear was hilarious. Anyway, I'm truly sorry for all the trouble. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.19.42.252 (talk) 09:54, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Crboyer; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

I tip my hat off to you for working on reverting the recent vandalism at The Muppets (film) page. Hard work always deserves a cup of relaxing tea. ~ Jedi94 (talk) 00:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Departed

Apologies. I made a passing glance at the Nominations section and glazed over the fact that it said "Golden Globes". My mistake. Corvoe (speak to me) 01:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Emik Avakian

I have discovered a YouTube video which says that he died. Unfortunately, as of now, there is no other source to be found. Would this YouTube video be suffice? I have even spoke to the wife of Avakian and she says he died. Proudbolsahye (talk) 01:14, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Sotosbros

I saw over on The Flash (video game) you have run afoul of this user. Far more infuriating than the user's persistent edits on video game articles are the user's edit summaries and numerous IPs (all of which trace back to Southern California/Northern Mexico)... Good luck. --Jtalledo (talk) 18:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Wiki not editing

Are you having problems editing? I keep getting a server error page.74.83.46.103 (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Malaysian IP vandal

Please visit Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/1.9.102.177 and add details on the Malaysian IP vandal who has been adding false information on the cast of The Wolverine on other articles. - Areaseven (talk) 05:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Malaysian IP vandal

The recent vandalism you encountered is a problem we've had since December. Please check out the Sockpuppet investigation page and post your comments regarding this issue. - Areaseven (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Wolverine: Origin

If you'd care to explain yourself, instead of just erasing content, based on an umbrella term, that'd be great.... Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonamatic (talk • contribs) 06:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Edge of Tomorrow

There's no way Cage and Rita get out of a highly fortified military base/hospital crawling with guards (which the movie itself highlights on the first try. After watching the movie 4 times, you notice the movie cuts from the hospital scene directly to them hiding behind 2 crates. Cruise knows exactly when the guard sees them and moves according. He has done this before. The power of editing means we don't need to take the movie linearly. We could be seeing any number of edits at a given time. Evidence highly points to the fact that he did not lose the power when he told Rita he did.

24.7.58.65 (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)musing

Christine Cavanagh in film

The link I originally posted by her space was for the Rugrats (film series). I thought that I should follow what was written Robin Williams's space since there a link to the Night at the Museum (film series), which has a shorter name. And1987 (talk) 01:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Governor Brewer's page

I was adding the citations. As far as a source for all of it, I worked for Governor Brewer and was involved either directly or indriectly with a large portion of the accomplishments. Azcoyotesrock (talk) 05:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Azcoyotesrock

FYI

Editors can remove posts from their own talk page but thanks for your effort. I have no idea what this IP is doing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

And thanks again for the AIV report. You beat me to it. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Siegel

IP is trying to sucker editors into an edit war; I screwed up and got caught in a fourth revision and was immediately reported. Please be careful. Scr★pIron^IV 04:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

but you shouldnt say it was box office bomb here. it should be down in the box office part --معتاز (talk) 06:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC) معتاز

Well...

I wonder who we (in general) pissed off this time? Amaury (talk) 04:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Future Disney Releases

Regarding the List of Walt Disney Pictures films page, Mary Poppins is missing and the Han Solo Star Wars film has a release date of May 25, 2018. Crazyfordisney (talk) 10:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

References

Rangeblock

I rangeblocked 184.151.176.0/20. Hopefully this catches all of them. Let me know if it doesn't -- Samir 06:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1991 in film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action and Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

20th Century Fox

Never mind for what you did to my editing's in these two pages. I just want 20th Century Fox to be warned about my opinion(on what to do with the rights of the fantastic four) ands I didn't know other way to warn them.

Film vandal

I ran into the 180.216.119.87 vandal you reported. While doing some cleanup, I noticed that 101.186.148.84 might need reviewed as well. Seems to have hit some of the same articles. -- ferret (talk) 01:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

February 2016

Hello, I'm JQTriple7. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Boeing 777— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JQTriple7 ^talk 10:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

The Revenant cite list error

At the end of the citations list in the bibliography of The Revenant there is a cite error printing out. I gave it a short search though I couldn't locate it, could you give it look when time allow. Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 16:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Nice fix on the cite error. What are your thoughts on the size of the Plot section there now, it seems to have grown over the week-end. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 17:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Opinion please

Hello. A relatively new user has reported the IP 134.83.3.173 to AIV for vandalism on Sulima coat of arms. I see you are editing that article so are probably more familiar with it than I am; I'd value your opinion on whether you think that IP's contributions do constitute vandalism and warrant a block. I see quite a few references being removed (which is a form of vandalism) but also a lot of content editing which seems more acceptable, so I'm not quite sure what to make of it! WaggersTALK 08:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. WaggersTALK 08:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sulima coat of arms page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for helping revert the vandal who undos my recent edits. Sro23 (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete "TriStar Pictures Entertainment" redirect

Are you able to delete the TriStar Pictures Entertainment redirect? Because there was no such name. King Shadeed 19:08, July 1, 2016 (UTC)

I can't delete it personally as I'm not an administrator. I'll have to see how the deletion template works. I've been having issues with the vandal who insists it is a thing. (See User talk:Arik069). They won't listen to any messages. Crboyer (talk) 23:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

i am sorry. i will obey. i will behave. i will be a good editor. Arik069 (talk) 7:29 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Wait a minute

you said Columbia is never going to be devoloping a Judy garland biography movie. you silly goose. you are making me laugh. i am so sorry, sir. all of this and that has got to edit. according to Logopedia 2, Columbia is shutting down, so (TriStar Pictures Entertainment (eOne) is devoloping a Judy garland biography movie instead. thank you. Arik069 (talk) 3:40 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Crboyer, you can pretty much ignore this message. Logopedia 2 is another fan-run wiki over on Wikia, so it is not an official source for information about either company. According to the edit history of the Columbia Pictures page, Arikhartnett is the one who has been saying it's closed. There is currently a sockpuppet investigation underway into the Arikhartnett and Arik069 accounts here, and both accounts with matching names over on Wikia became globally blocked within the past two weeks. —RRabbit42 (talk) 22:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

You heard him, Crboyer. RRabbit42 Productions said me and Arikhartnett are going to be globally blocked for 20 years if we break the rules. Arik069 (talk) 7:01 31 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Crboyer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:97.88.225.207

User above continues to vandalize multiple pages.74.83.113.39 (talk) 00:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monster House. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Careful about the 3RR

Just wanted you to be weary of the Three Revert Rule regarding edits. I do not want you to get in trouble for reverting that vandals edits as much as he has clearly violated the policy. Hopefully an admin will permanently ban him/her soon. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • _{I DX for fun!} 03:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Deaths in 2017

Noted your edit in error as I understand it. Thanks for going back and reverting yourself. Ref ^(chew)(do) 18:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Hi Crboyer. Thanks for stepping up at RfA. The community needs more admins. Unfortunately you are not going to pass this time around. As someone whose RfA was contentious I understand from personal experience that the experience can be stressful. But we are where we are. As difficult as it might be I am going to gently suggest you consider withdrawing. Keeping an RfA open once any reasonable hope of passing has gone serves no useful purpose and some editors may interpret it as showing a lack of respect for the community. It can even generate more oppose votes. I'd suggest you work on expanding your resume over the next year and consider giving it another shot. Try WP:OCRP first so they can let you know if there are any issues that need to be addressed. Thanks again for offering your services and for all of your other work on the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Crboyer, though @Cyberpower678: SNOW closed your RfA, it was with an unusual caveat to allow thawing by you - however this would need to be done rapidly to keep the RfA valid. If you sincerely would like it to resume within the day, consideration for extending the closing time will be evaluated. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
• I was sorry to have to oppose your RfA. What I'd recommend is you accept the close of this one now, then spend some time getting involved in areas like CSD, AFD etc to build up a record of experience. But before doing that, read and learn the relevant policies. If you did that and could demonstrate that you understand key policies (by your answers to questions and your new-found experience), I could see myself supporting a future run. Oh, and finally, many thanks for your anti-vandalism work. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your tireless defense of the Wiki. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Mabromov - incorrect information

There is incorrect information on Wonder Woman (2017) that is being reverted. It is not considered to be one of the greatest superhero films ever, it's way too earlier to make this claim. Several other superhero films have higher rotten tomatoes scores than Wonder Woman, yet they don't have the tagline of " one of the greatest superhero movies." Using Rotten Tomatoes as the only source of info is flawed, and this case, incorrect. Please let me get rid of this incorrect info. Thank you.

It's currently [the highest ranked superhero film on Rottentomatoes's page here], even topping several others that had higher Tomato Meter scores. Their basis here is their adjusted Tomato Meter, which probably factors more than just critical reviews (like User reviews, I presume). It's listed on List of films considered the best on the basis of the same Rottentomatoes source. Please direct your future inquiries to Talk:Wonder Woman (2017 film), not my talk page.Crboyer (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

One final warning

That is more than enough. Adding more than one is just adding fuel to the fire. Simply report to AIV, continue to revert until they are blocked. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 06:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

FishCenter Live userboxes

if you're interested, I started a series of FishCenter Live userboxes.-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 15:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Crboyer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Crboyer!

Happy New Year!

Crboyer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Boomer Vial^{Happy Holidays! • Contribs} 07:20, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Why

Re this edit. User:Colgsher is a sock (now blocked) of a banned editor known for editing against consensus. If you are familiar with the article/subject and feel the edit is valid, you are certainly free to make the change. - SummerPhD^v2.0 18:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Orlando Bloom

Thanks for this edit [2]. I was actually about to comment myself but ran into an edit conflict with you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Re:

This is more for information than any other reason, but it's also a bit of caution. My post here was meant for the IP. It's important for you to know that being right will not protect an editor from possible sanctions with regards to edit warring. I know it's frustrating but just try to maintain your cool when dealing with tendentious, non-responsive editors. Regards, Tiderolls 21:06, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Power Rangers RPM & Kamen Rider Dragon Knight same year and same Saturday

Is it okay to add "It aired alongside Power Rangers: R.P.M. on ABC's saturday morning block, ABC Kids."? on it? Cause they aired on the same year, and the 2 shows are made by Toei Company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PascalMuganyizi (talk • contribs) 12:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank You for Informing me, boi.

I thought that Part 3 also won Best Picture since its prequels were winners. Sorry, for the misguidance. 2405:204:E104:40FE:B029:643A:1A9E:6E16 (talk) 05:48, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Shape of Water

You reverted my edit of the page for Shape of Water movie. I still say the ethnicity of the character is irrelevant and could be any race or ethnicity. Note says there's a dissent on Talk page but I don't see it on my page or your page. Can you assist? Evanvalken (talk) 04:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Crboyer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Crboyer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 122.57.49.56 (talk) 02:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Deaths in 2019

Thank you for fixing the format. I didn't realize I forgot the asterisk at the beginning. I'll be more careful next time. Timothy McGuire (talk) 05:35, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Rio (2011 video game)

Hi Crboyer. You made me confused why you revert my edit by accident but then you revert your edit back to my. It's nothing bad, I'm saying that your edit confused me.

Benjaminkirsc (talk) 12:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

21 Savage and Bloods category

Hello. Why did you remove Category:Bloods from the 21 Savage article? —BarrelProof (talk) 19:31, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the response. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi there!

Hi Crboyer, please join the discussion here to resolved this moustache issue. 124.176.145.159 (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work reverting all those edits :) WikiAviator (talk) 02:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5