Crawfd

Edits to Talk:Lucid dream

Please do not remove comments from article talk pages even if you did start the thread. As a contributor to the thred I object to having my posts removed and believe the content may well be relevent should your site decide to try and promote itself through Wikipedia in the future. -- SiobhanHansa 21:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

You don't have a right to remove a thread on a talk page just because you started it. Please see our How-to on refactoring talk pages which states: If another editor objects to refactoring then the changes should be reverted. I most definitely object to the removal of the thread. -- SiobhanHansa 00:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Regarding "Refactoring should only be done when there is an assumption of good faith by editors (plural) who have contributed to the talk page." That would be you doing the refactoring - I am merely restoring the age to it's original content. Also I do not have a vendetta against your site. But I am a member of Wikiproject Spam and I work hard to counter the use of Wikipedia as a promotional platform. Especdially by sites that do not meet our content guidelines like your own and against editors who are only here to promote their own sites and have not in anyway engaged in editing that improves the encyclopedia.

My comments were pointed but factual and not incivil. You have been attempting to promote your link on Wikipedia which is against our policies and guidelines and in some instances fit our definition of spamming. You are not entitled to remove my comments because the discussion brought up evidence you would rather had not been revealed.

Note also that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Continuing may lead to you being blocked from editing. If you wish to take this further you will need to follow some other path of dispute resolution. -- SiobhanHansa 12:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)