Craig powe
Recent edit to Physical exercise edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Physical exercise, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Morphdogflames 19:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Craig powe, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Craig powe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC) |
Stop marking major edits as minor edit
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
References edit
Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of RDX (Band) for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RDX (Band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RDX (Band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Craig powe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand why I was blocked. I read the guidelines to editing articles and also about what kind of content should be put on Wikipedia. I am working tirelessly to address my article and will make sure to cross reference the result with all the guidelines once more to make sure I am within the rules. therefore I hope I will be unblocked. Thank you very much, have a great day
Decline reason:
This is not sufficiently convincing. In what way were your existing contributions inappropriate? In what specific ways will all your future edits be radically different? Yamla (talk) 13:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Craig powe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I read the guidelines to editing articles and also about what kind of content should be put on Wikipedia. I understand that in my case, I edited articles without properly indicating the gravity of that edit. I made a grave mistake in editing text and paragraphs and naming it a minor edit. I now know through my reading of the rules that a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. I made major edits and I am very willing to correct all my edits, putting in high-quality reliable sources. I did not have high-quality reliable sources such as published scientific journals, major textbooks or works from international organizations. I am very sorry for this and as said before I will definitely rectify the situation by including these. I thoroughly read the WP:MEDHOW and I fully understand how to properly make edits to articles relating to health. In regards to my article, I had primarily Original Research which after reading the Wikipedia guidelines on uploading content I realize is a direct contradiction to what Wikipedia stands for. I am very sorry for this and I now know that my content must be attributable to a reliable, published source. My article must also be verifiable, meaning persons using the encyclopaedia must be able to check that the information comes from a reliable source. The burden of verifiability is on me, the editor, to provide citations from reliable sources. I now know this so I will definitely provide high quality, reliable sources to my article. There were also some concerns about possible conflicts of interest and advertising or promotion. I now know that any article regarding a product, service or organization must be free of biased language. It must be neutral and be heavily supported by notable third party references. I am very sorry for not unclosing these in my article. I am sorry for the language of the article. I am committed to correcting the article, by adding the relevant reliable sources so that my information is unbiased and verifiable. Furthermore, I will definitely correct the tone of the article. I will make it unbiased and objective. My future contributions to Wikipedia will be totally above board. I will use reliable sources, ensure my articles are not for self-promotion and in my edits, I will mark them major or minor when necessary. At the same time, I will support all my edits with reliable third party sources, I understand that my actions were very disruptive and went against what Wikipedia stands for; I am very sorry. I will absolutely fix all my errors and I hope that my block is reversed.
Craig powe (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline. No response in 18 days. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.