Speedy deletion of Ideal Technology

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Ideal Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 16:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The article Ideal Technology was deleted as a recreation of a deleted article, and the author of that article was blocked for recreating the article. Insofar that your edits are a copy of that editors contribution it is likely you are a alternate account of that editor. Both recreation, without improvement, of deleted material and abusing alternate accounts are serious violations of Wikipedia policy and you have therefore been blocked indefinitely. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply