Cradashj

Malta

I never said they were pure Arabs, I simply stated the facts, the Arabs ruled Malta from the 9th century to the Norman Conquest. There are even Arab gravestones on Gozo. Maltese is an Arabis dialect.Al-Zaidi (talk) 07:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Being Christian doesn't mean you cannot be Arab. Being Arab doesn't mean you cannot be Christian since Lebanese, Iraqis, Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, Egypt, Sicily, Sardinia, Calabria, Andalusia, and Yes Malta is no exception. In Spain there was the Inquisition, and Arabs became Catholic. During the Norman Conquest Arabs in Malta and Sicily became Catholic. If you read your history, you will see that being Arab and being in Europe is not impossible, the Roman Emperor Phillip was known as Phillip the Arab. Al-Zaidi (talk) 06:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't say Maltese are Iraqi i said You can be Arab and Christian at the same time.Al-Zaidi (talk) 04:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Sicani

Sorry, we've had someone in for a third opinion and they agreed that these refs are worthless. Please, let's stick to encyclopedic material. I'm bewildered by why this article should be such a magnate for these claims.

The settlement of Gozo & Malta from Sicily is not the issue. The question is whether that had anything to do with the Sicani. Until we have encyclopic references establishing that, the settlement of Gozo is extraneous to the topic. kwami (talk) 05:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Kwamikagami

The user has extremely over violated the 3 Revert rule, and protected the page to get his own way. The user should be reported on the WP:AN3RR, or even the WP:ANI, where I think the community needs to hear about this user. 78.146.189.99 (talk) 11:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Just a note

Check this version of the mediation page. Look at all the evidence against Kwamikagami, and at the reference provided, etc. Then look at how Kwamikagami removed all the evidence against him. Just thought you should read it. Cheers 78.149.148.232 (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Cradashj,

Just so you're not taken in, that editor was being disruptive and was blocked for trolling, and has also been removed from the list of interested parties for being a sockpuppet. I'd appreciate it if you would join in the discussion. Maybe we're just not understanding each other. kwami (talk) 10:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

The evidence speaks for itself. There has been no confirming evidence provided of sockpuppetery. Kwamikagami is just eager to remove the evidence of his edit warring. Anyway, check it out though... you'll be surprised at just how many edit wars Kwami's been in.

"that editor was being disruptive" Really?? LOL. You mean being disruptive by highlighting your behavior? 78.149.148.232 (talk) 10:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Cradashj, are you interested? All other parties on your side have been banned or removed from the discussion. You're the only one left who's pushed for these edits. If you don't wish to join the discussion, that's fine; I'll just ask that it be closed. kwami (talk) 02:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

← Hey, I'm the mediator over at medcab. here's the link to the case page, if you are interested. If you do not wish to participate, I will close the case without problem :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 05:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

[1]

See debate. 89.243.57.7 (talk) 19:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)