CplDHicks2

re SPI

Thanks for that assist! You might want to take a renewed interest at talk:NEMA connector as well. Jeh (talk) 06:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Don't thank me. I'm only assisting to curb the shitty behaviour of someone else, not to help you, and only because their pattern of behaviour is clearer now. You have to be joking to think I'd want to contribute to Talk:NEMA connector ever again, after you were an obstinate prick toward me nine months ago on that very same page. It's precisely because of shitty behaviour like that that I have absolutely no desire to contribute whatsoever to Wikipedia anymore. I do find it amusing that the arguments you've been making on Talk:NEMA connector were the exact same that I made nine months ago, that you and others threw right back in my face. I have assisted you in this SPI, but I have less than zero interest in being your pal going forward. You need to re-evaluate your own behaviour. In closing I've got six words for you, Jeh: fuck you, I told you so. CplDHicks2 (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

All I said back then was... oh, never mind. I was wrong then, and I apologize. Jeh (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Am I the only one seeing a pattern?

@Jeh:, @Wtshymanski:, @Gah4:; please humour me and review this w.r.t. JimmiCheddar & FF-UK: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SSHamilton/Archive

Am I the only one seeing a pattern here? See FF-UK vs. Mautby vs. Deucharman's contributions, JimmiCheddar vs. Mautby vs. Deucharman's contributions, this & this, this entire exchange, this vs. this... Does this not seem like the work of one very persistent, argumentative editor? CplDHicks2 (talk) 22:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

This is the first time I have even thought about a sock puppet investigation. I have been in various disagreements with FF-UK over the years on these pages. As I (recently) understand, there are administrators that can track IP addresses, but then again, it is easy to fake those. If you have an account on a machine somewhere far away, just log in and submit from there. It might be interesting to look at the distribution of edit times, which could depend on time zone, or other life considerations. Ask me a specific question, and I will try to answer it. Gah4 (talk) 22:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

@CplDHicks2: I just saw this. I'm at work atm but I'll try look at this in detail over the next couple of days. I certainly have noticed the Mautby/Deucharman similarities. btw, Cpl, there's something I would like to send to you by email - if you open that up (it's under preferences, user profile tab, "allow wikipedia users to email me") for a short time, I promise to not abuse it. Or you could email me through the WP interface. Jeh (talk) 22:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Go for it. CplDHicks2 (talk) 01:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chevrolet 153 4-cylinder engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Falcon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fort La Jonquière, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guy Carleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

this article needs massive fixes to the inappropriate tone, and general grammar and spelling fixes throughout

Them's fight'n words. Can you stir yourself to showing the adjustments you believe needed on just one (small please) paragraph. Please. Eddaido (talk) 02:12, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

I started a new section on the article's talk page; don't know why you didn't engage in this discussion there. FYI I'm just going to copy your comment from here and respond to it there. CplDHicks2 (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volkswagen air-cooled engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

IIHF

The player still has to be registred to the IIHF, which has not been done so far. That's all i said, as there are more articles saying players are in some rosters when they are actually aren't because they got cut or whatever. See, isn't it nice to write to someone without calling him a donkey or so...? Kante4 (talk) 11:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

You were overzealously relying on a single source and unnecessarily deleting content from the article. Had you waited a few days your precious IIHF registrations would have been updated accordingly. As far as I could tell you were never going to put Mangiapane's name back in the article, which was quite simply erroneous in face of the source that was already presented that said he was on the team. And now it looks ridiculous that you deleted him from the roster in the first place: he's already sixth in scoring after a scant three games played, and arguably the best player in the entire tournament. Deleting Mangiapane's name from the Canadian roster was asinine, and I'm not going to apologize for saying so.

Ultimately I'm happy you're going back and reversing your own edits—for example how you erased Dominik Bittner, John Peterka, Daniel Fischbuch and Andreas Eder from the German roster, and put them back only four days later—but you were ultimately wasting your time in the first place. Hopefully you see that now. I had no reason to believe you would go back and fix your mistakes. CplDHicks2 (talk) 22:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

I do add players when they are officially registred, which happens when the IIHF updates their pdf document for the specific roster. Kante4 (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Well, well, well. How does it feel in retrospect to have deleted the tournament's Most Valuable Player from that article? I bet you still don't understand why your revert was unnecessary, and don't appreciate just how foolish you look now. CplDHicks2 (talk) 23:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Overlink

Please don't overlink nationalities. --188.143.109.174 (talk) 08:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Well I didn't realize once was too much... *rolleyes* CplDHicks2 (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)