Coupleabc

Welcome

Hello, Coupleabc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Female ejaculation stuff

Hi, Coupleabc. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Archive 90#Image at female ejaculation article and this discussion at Talk:Female ejaculation. Because of what I stated there, I reverted you on this addition you made to the Female ejaculation article. Whether or not female ejaculation exists is highly debated; its existence (beyond the belief that it is urine or mostly urine) has not truly been proven. Because of this, I believe that it is irresponsible for Wikipedia to put up a real-life image of supposed female ejaculation with the claim that it is female ejaculation. Furthermore, at the Vaginal lubrication article, you titled the caption as "Vaginal lubrication of a heavely aroused woman." You cannot simply take a vaginal lubrication image and title it "female ejaculation." I reverted you at the Vaginal lubrication article because there are already two real-life images of vaginal lubrication in the article, and one is from you; I don't see that another is needed. I reverted you at the Sexual arousal article because you were claiming the image as female ejaculation there as well, and because we already have a vaginal lubrication image there; one is enough, just like one real-life image of male erection is enough for that article. If you want to dispute me on these matters, I suggest you bring your case up on the article talk pages. Do not WP:Edit war. I also want to take this time to point you to WP:GRATUITOUS, and ask that you keep that guideline in mind when adding images to articles. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)