September 2007

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tokyo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tokyo was changed by Cosc (c) (t) deleting 11607 characters on 2007-09-20T09:51:58+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 13:52, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not Vandalism. --Cosc 14:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your edits to Tokyo:

edit

Your recent edit to Tokyo (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 14:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tokyo rewrite

edit

Can you please discuss this change at talk:Tokyo? I (not a bot) manually reverted it the first time you made this change. The only comments about it so far are my initial comment and a supportive one from user:Sasanoha. There are at least 4 or 5 other users who pay attention to this article - I'd like to hear from them before proceeding with the rewrite. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 18:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Rick Block. Please discuss the change at talk:Tokyo. Without discussion, we do not understand your reason for this change. Fg2 10:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tokyo. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. .

Please also note that the history section you're including appears to be a copyright violation - directly copied from http://www.sakura-house.com/tips/tokyo_general/history/history.htm. Copyright violations are taken very seriously. Edit warring is bad. Edit warring to include a copyright violation is completely unacceptable. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

October 2007

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tokyo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tokyo was changed by Cosc (c) (t) deleting 10014 characters on 2007-10-01T15:17:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 15:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tokyo. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Gscshoyru 15:53, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

October 2007

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tokyo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tokyo was changed by Cosc (c) (t) deleting 11506 characters on 2007-10-05T04:41:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 04:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Tokyo. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --DAJF 05:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Japan Infobox

edit

Template:Japan Infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --DAJF 13:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deleting comments on talk page

edit

Please do not delete comments on this page. If you object to the nomination for deletion, you should comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. --DAJF 13:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD tag removal

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Template:Japan Infobox. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Tarc 14:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for speedy deletion

edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox japan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DAJF 02:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

October 2007

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tokyo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tokyo was changed by Cosc (c) (t) deleting 12073 characters on 2007-10-07T15:05:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 15:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tokyo. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --DAJF 15:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

After the notice above, you went ahead and reverted. That's your third reversion of the day. Any more and you'll be blocked.
User:DAJF invited you to explain what you were doing in the talk page. You did not take up this invitation.
Your behavior seems disruptive. Please consider it very carefully. -- Hoary 15:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • I'M sorry.--Cosc 15:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violation of WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ronnotel 17:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ronnotel 17:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Still edit warring

edit

  You are edit warring again. You really must stop this. If you don't you will be blocked again (for a longer period of time). I'd suggest not editing Tokyo again until there's a consensus on the talk page favoring some (specific) change you propose. For more on how to resolve editorial conflicts, please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. -- Rick Block (talk) 18:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Tokyo. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Oda Mari (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Who do you think you are?

edit

I am myself. Who are you? 68.36.214.143 19:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blanking user page

edit

  Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Cosc. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --DAJF 22:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox Prefecture Japan

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Infobox Prefecture Japan, you will be blocked from editing. Tarc 13:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Infobox Prefecture Japan, you will be blocked from editing. Oda Mari (talk) 10:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tokyo

edit
 

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tokyo, you will be blocked from editing. Tarc 21:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deleting warnings from user page

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Cosc, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF 00:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for three-revert rule gaming and copyright violation. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

- Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 00:38, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tokyo again

edit

On this edit of yours:

  • Don't make sweeping changes to an article such as this without first getting agreement on the article's talk page.
  • Provide informative edit summaries.
  • Avoid getting into an edit war.

Thank you. -- Hoary 09:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tokyo

edit

I have never edited the Tokyo article so I may be a neutral party. I am interested in Tokyo. If you have a dispute with User:DAJF, I would be happy to informally try to help you reach a solution. Just let me know. Archtransit 23:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Categories

edit

Hello, I have removed the categories from User:Cosc/Tokyo. This page in your userspace should not appear in articlespace categories like category:Capitals in Asia. Arthena(talk) 17:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply