User talk:Cory Malik/Archive 1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ndenison in topic July 2008
User:Cory Malik User talk:Cory Malik User:Cory Malik/Barnstars Special:Prefixindex/User:Cory Malik Special:Contributions/Cory Malik User:Cory Malik/Archives Special:Emailuser/Cory Malik
User Page
Talk Page
Barnstars/Userboxes
Site Map
Contributions
Edit Count
Archives
Email


This is my user talk archive for May 2008-July 2008.

Welcome

Hello, Cory Malik! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --VS talk 23:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

May 2008

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody main characters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. BoccobrockT 00:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The S.S. Tipton. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Disney Society, despite the name, is just another fan site and is not a reliable source of information. NrDg 04:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


The recent edit you made to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ——Ryan | tc 22:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Normally you can request deletion of a page you create by blanking the contents or putting {{db-author}} at the top. In this case, however, other people have edited the page so the requirement that are the only one to make significant edits has not been made. A redirect to the main article is sufficient for now. --NrDg 23:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody main characters, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Exarion (talk) 23:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

okay --Cory Malik (talk) 03:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Please Desist

  Your edits to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody and related articles do not have consensus and I have had to revert you multiple times now over the past several days since you have failed to establish consensus for your broad and sweeping changes. Everyone is welcome to edit Wikipedia, but you need to read our consensus policies to find out how the editing process works. If you continue to make such edits without first obtaining consensus, the pages will need to be placed under protection. Eusebeus (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

The changeing of Suite Life was constructive--Cory Malik (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Please discuss your desired changes on the main article talk page to generate consensus. What you think personally is not germane to establishing that consensus. I will weigh in further there, when you have initiated the discussion. You really need to review WP:BRD and WP:CON to understand why you should stop implementing further changes until this consensus can be shown to exist. Also check out WP:3RR. Thanks. Eusebeus (talk) 14:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

I Love Money

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to move I Love Money by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Admc2006 (talk) 21:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

THANK YOU SOOOOOO MUCH!!!!!

Thank you SOOOOOOOOO much for bringing back the Rico page. I had tried a billion times and it never worked out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.151.118 (talk) 23:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

London Tipton

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to London Tipton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ndenison talk 16:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)