CopperPhoenix

Welcome to CopperPhoenix's Talk Page: Please leave a message and I will reply as soon as possible.

CopperPhoenix, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CopperPhoenix! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

CMP

I noticed this edit and think it's a good one.

BTW, you may be interested to know that David Daleiden was likely one of those activists. The Fusion GPS "Analysis of Center for Medical Progress Videos" reveals that he slipped up and used his name, and then tried to save the situation by using another name. He is being sued, and, to avoid self-incrimination, is currently planning to plead the Fifth Amendment. -- BullRangifer (talk) 23:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

References

Styles of English

Hi CopperPhoenix. Welcome.

I noticed your edit summary. It is not that simple. Articles about US places or people use US English. Those about Britain and its former dominions (obviously excluding US) use British or Canadian, Australian etc English. For general subjects it depends who got there first. You can read the details at WP:ENGVAR.Charles (talk) 08:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the clarification. I was unsure of the rules regarding use of local English spellings. In the Tannenberg article, I was merely reverting edits to their original (American English) spellings. Following those reverts, I did in fact look at the WP:ENGVAR and now understand when to use the different dialects. Again, thank you for succinctly clarifying the WP rules concerning language usage. CopperPhoenix (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Max Blumenthal

Almost certainly without realizing it, you have violated the 1RR restriction that applies to the article because of WP:ARBPIA. See the warning template at the top of Talk:Max Blumenthal. Please self-revert (undo your last edit) to avoid being reported. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

In fact, as an editor with fewer than 500 edits, you are not permitted to edit the article at all per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

You are right, I was unaware that such a rule existed. Thanks for letting me know. CopperPhoenix (talk) 03:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CopperPhoenix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CopperPhoenix. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CopperPhoenix. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CopperPhoenix. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)