Coolzone

Please refer to the following guidelines about linking to blogs...Wikipedia has very strict guidelines against self-published material:

From WP:V:

Self-published sources (online and paper) Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources.

From WP:NOR:

Reliable sources Main article: Wikipedia:Verifiability

Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be accompanied by a reliable source. Material that counts as "original research" within the meaning of this policy is material for which no reliable source can be found and which is therefore believed to be the original thought of the Wikipedian who added it. The only way to show your work is not original research is to produce a reliable published source who writes about the same claims or advances the same argument as you.

There is no firm definition of "reliable," although most of us have a good intuition about the meaning of the word. In general, the most reliable sources are books and journals published by university presses; mainstream newspapers; and magazines and journals published by known publishing houses. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analysing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Material that is self-published, whether on paper or online, is generally not regarded as reliable, but see Wikipedia:Verifiability for exceptions.

Hope these makes the policies clear to you. --- Tito Pao 18:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Still not allowed, even if under external links

See Wikipedia:External_links. Blogs are still not allowed even if it's placed under "External links". The only allowed exception would be an official blog. --- Tito Pao 19:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Super Twins and Sailor Moon.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Super Twins and Sailor Moon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Howard the Duck 17:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Also added: Image:Sailor Twins Altered.jpg. --Howard the Duck 17:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Super Twins.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Super Twins.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)