ConnorBringas

Wikipedia is NOT for advertising

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Underground elephant, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. For more information on why the article was deleted, please see the notability guidelines, the reliable source guidelines, and the rules against using Wikipedia for promotion. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Looking at your Facebook page, I see you have a conflict of interest

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

1. You may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
2. Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guideline to avoid editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Underground elephant, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:59, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Lead generation. ... discospinster _talk 00:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Education leads

A tag has been placed on Education leads, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 00:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

A friendly note

While a concept such as "education leads" could well be worth a Wikipedia article in the context of one of a number of marketing techniques or tools, such an article would need to arise from information gathered from a variety of independent published sources. It should not single out a single company as an example. Sources should include significant coverage in mainstream media, articles in trade publications (excluding those that are routine company profiles), or textbooks. Such coverage would need to satisfy the Wikipedia policy on WP:reliable sources and demonstrate that the concept has sufficient WP:notability to justify such an article. At this time, the article you created does not satisfy these requirements.

If you would like to try again, I suggest that you use the WP:Articles for creation process, so that the proposed article can be reviewed by other editors. Since you appear to be involved in the industry, I recommend that you state up-front that you may have a conflict-of-interest and take care steer clear of content that might be considered promotional.

Although your initial intent may not have been compatible with Wikipedia policies, we never know where our future editors will come from. I encourage you to explore other ways to contribute to Wikipedia. Good luck. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)