September 2008 edit

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to High Bridge, New Jersey, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Click here for details of some of your recent vandalism. Alansohn (talk) 03:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vandal edit

Sorry Alansohn

Didn't realize that one persons idea of relative data was vandalism to another. I will still continue to edit, but me more careful and cognizant of your feelings. RegardsCommonsPark (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

One of the hallmarks of vandalism is the removal of sourced content from articles, especially doing so without explanation or justification. Doing so multiple times to the same article is often the best confirmation of a likely vandal. While in the process of building an encyclopedia it is sometime necessary to remove sourced material from articles, the best way to go ahead with these actions is to provide a clear and concise explanation in the edit summary of why the encyclopedia is improved by removing this content. An even better avenue to address possible concerns is to discuss them on the article's talk page and see if there is support for your proposed changes. There is always room for improvement, but unexplained removal of properly sourced content is rarely one of them. Alansohn (talk) 15:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fine, we will work within your self described framework and justifications. Stating elected officials is somewhat acceptable but I do not understand why recent elections find there way into sourced content without explaining all elections previous. Clearly there were more important moments in history for the borough. It would seem this would allow a referenced material to become outdated rather quickly. CommonsPark (talk) 19:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

As with many other facts, their relevance may fade as time passes, but these results are certainly relevant for those individuals currently serving on the council. I have maintained this information here and commit to maintaining it in the future and updating it with future election results, including for the upcoming November election. Alansohn (talk) 04:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply