Combatshadowz

Welcome!

Hello, Combatshadowz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Kripashankar Singh

I reverted your edits at Kripashankar Singh. On Wikipedia we should use normal capitalization, meaning that we don't capitalize every word in a header. Debresser (talk) 23:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rahul Gandhi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. доктор прагматик 16:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Note to administrators - this was not deliberately disruptive editing but instead a new user engaged in a content dispute. They were probably not aware of the 3-revert rule and as such this warning appears to be an example of a lack of good faith. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Combatshadowz. You have new messages at Dr.pragmatist's talk page.
Message added 14:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

доктор прагматик 14:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Rahul Gandhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please ignore the warning above, but please also heed this one. If you feel that your edits are more appropriate than the current version of the article, please discuss them on the article's talk page rather than reverting the edits of another user without further co-operative discussion. I hope that both of you will be able to find an amicable outcome to this content issue. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Have i violated 3RR really, i do not think so. Instead i kept my self stick to BLP policies and guide lines only. --доктор прагматик 08:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)