Welcome!

Hello, Colecoman1982, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notability of HackerbotLabs

edit

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

 

The article HackerbotLabs has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 00:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I3detroit

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of I3detroit, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://i3detroit.com/wi/index.php?title=I3Detroit:About. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, I3detroit, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://i3detroit.com/wi/index.php?title=I3Detroit:About. As a copyright violation, I3detroit appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. I3detroit has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Even though the page is under a Creative Commons license, it includes the "noncommercial" restriction. Wikipedia can only use CC content which permits commercial re-use, since downstream users of Wikipedia may wind up using the content commercially. —C.Fred (talk) 00:22, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: individual hackerspace pages

edit

As I mentioned in your talk page, I apologize for the misunderstanding about the notability rules. I will be sure to read up on them before posting further. Also, the i3detroit page was posted immediately before I noticed your first comment to me. As for the copyright issue, I tried to apply the attribution rules provided on the site I took it from. If Wikipedia has additional requirements, as your comments confirm it does, then, again, I apologize. Colecoman1982 (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

As a general rule, text should be under a free license. Not only is there potential downstream use of the text, but articles are frequently edited, so there needs to be no restriction on altering the text. (With images, there are specific rules for when and how a non-free image can be used in an article, but those are also pretty restrictive.) Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, but we also need to make sure that nobody's income stream is hurt by the contribution here—that's why the restrictions are severe at times with non-free content. —C.Fred (talk) 00:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply