Blocked

edit

I have blocked you from editing for a while. Your edits are disruptive to Wikipedia, so I am stopping you from editing for a little while to give you a chance to learn about how to edit in Wikipedia constructively. Wikipedia, like any community, has policies to help editors with different views get along. You must follow those policies, or you will not be allowed to edit. I provided links to the key policies, as have other editors, but you deleted them from your talk page. I will provide them to you again (below) to encourage you to learn how to be a constructive contributor to Wikipedia. Ground Zero | t 20:40, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Ground Zero | t 20:40, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Blocking you again

edit

Your edits to G. K. Vasan violated a whole lot of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and made a mess of the article. I have blocked you from editing again since you have ignored my previous warning and advice. Please review the above links to learn how to edit constructively in Wikipedia. 17:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

As you have figured out, you can get around the block by not signing into Wikipedia. If you do this again, i will have to lock the article - this means that unregistered editors will not be able to edit the article. This will prevent you from making a mess of the article, but it will also prevent all ther unregistered editors from editing. Please do not make this happen. If you want to edit the article, you must learn how to edit Wikipedia articles properly. I have provided links above to help you. Ground Zero | t 11:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Parkavakulam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

I suspect that your addition may also have been a copy/paste from website. Please ensure that you have read WP:COPYRIGHT. Sitush (talk) 14:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Parkavakulam, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Parkavakulam with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of Parkavakulam personalities. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply