Welcome!

edit

Hi ClydeIsKool! I noticed your contributions to Rick Pitino and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 00:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Throast. Feels good to contribute to the cause. Hope I can find more time.
Best,
ClydeIsKool ClydeIsKool (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craig Tooman (February 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 01:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ClydeIsKool! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 01:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth Kaufman (June 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 22:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Thanks for the feedback. I know Publishers Weekly, which is the bible of publishing, reviewed his work. But I'll look around and update. ClydeIsKool (talk) 16:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craig Tooman (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Turnagra (talk) 23:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the feedback.
He struck me as someone who has been highly involved in several notable pharma deals. But I will look around to address your concerns.
Thanks again.
Clyde. ClydeIsKool (talk) 16:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth Kaufman (October 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:  The comment the reviewer left was:
Johannes, I've been sick and missed your comments. Thank you for reviewing, but I don't understand what you mean about sources? The subject is featured in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Publishers Weekly, and many other places. He has written for the New Yorker and major publishers. What sources are "influenced?"
I will try and fix the "bare" citations. I'm not sure which they are.
Thanks,
Clyde. ClydeIsKool (talk) 02:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Craig Tooman

edit

  Hello, ClydeIsKool. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Craig Tooman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craig Tooman (December 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 02:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Seth Kaufman

edit

  Hello, ClydeIsKool. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seth Kaufman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply